This video discusses the DOJ's Second Amendment (2A) argument presented at the 7th Circuit in the case Barnett v. Raoul. It features clips of Harmeet Dhillon's statements to the court, highlighting her arguments about constitutional rights. The description also includes promotional material for Attorneys on Retainer and American Hartford Gold, along with social media links and a disclaimer that the content is opinion-based and not legal advice.
This video discusses a significant legal development in the ongoing fight over AR-15 bans, specifically focusing on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals' hearing on Illinois' "assault weapons" and magazine ban. The case stems from a previous ruling by Judge Stephen McGlynn, who declared the ban unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. The analysis is presented by Second Amendment scholar Mark W. Smith, who is a constitutional attorney and frequent Fox News guest. The discussion likely delves into the legal arguments presented and their potential implications for gun rights nationwide.
This video discusses a significant development in a legal challenge against AR-15 bans, with the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit set to hear arguments. Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, analyzes the case. Smith is a frequent Fox News guest and author of several books on gun rights, including "First They Came for the Gun Owners" and "Duped: How the Anti-gun Lobby Exploits the Parkland School Shooting, and How Gun Owners Can Fight Back." His work has influenced legal arguments, including those used to declare "assault weapon" bans unconstitutional. The video emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box, aiming to provide essential information for defending rights.
This video discusses a significant development where the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed an amicus brief and requested oral argument time before the 7th Circuit in the case of Barnett v. Raoul. This case challenges Illinois' Protect Illinois Communities Act, which includes an assault weapon ban and magazine ban. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law explains the implications of the DOJ's involvement, highlighting it as another momentous occasion for lawful gun owners. The description also promotes 'Right to Bear' for self-defense legal protection.
This video discusses the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Schoenthal v. Raoul, which upheld Illinois' ban on carrying firearms on public transportation. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk explains how the court found this ban to be consistent with the nation's history and tradition of firearms regulation, even for licensed individuals. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on this legal development and promotes the services of Right to Bear for self-defense protection and legal representation.
This video discusses a significant federal and state-level development that could impact "assault weapon" bans, specifically referencing the Harrel v. Raoul case. The case is currently in the 7th Circuit and has the potential to reach the Supreme Court. The description also includes promotions for American Hartford Gold and the creator's social media and merchandise, along with disclaimers about not being a lawyer and the educational/entertainment nature of the content.
This video discusses the US Department of Justice's participation as an Amicus party in the 7th Circuit's Barnett v. Raoul case, which challenges Illinois' "Protect Illinois Communities Act." William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes the Amicus brief, highlighting this as a significant shift in DOJ policy towards supporting Second Amendment rights. The content aims to educate viewers on legal challenges to gun laws and empower them with knowledge.
This video discusses a recent Illinois court ruling that upholds the state's assault weapon ban. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes the Viramontes v. Cook County case, focusing on the legal standards being applied by courts he believes are aiming for civilian disarmament. He notes the Supreme Court's apparent disinterest in Second Amendment cases and anticipates further state-level restrictions. The content encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides links to the court opinion, a video idea submission form, and the Washington Gun Law newsletter.
This video features William Kirk discussing an amicus brief filed by Giffords in the case of Barnett v. Raoul, challenging the Protect Illinois Communities Act. Kirk alleges that Giffords uses "creative writing" and fabricates information to advance its civilian disarmament agenda. The content aims to educate viewers on these alleged misrepresentations and encourage them to 'arm themselves with education' regarding their Second Amendment rights. Links are provided to the brief itself, a video idea submission form, a newsletter subscription, and contact information for Washington Gun Law.
This video discusses a significant ruling by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. Rush, where a three-judge panel determined that Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs) are not considered "bearable arms" protected by the Second Amendment. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, breaks down the implications of this decision, suggesting it's not entirely surprising given existing court precedent and the 7th Circuit's general stance. The video aims to educate viewers on this critical legal development affecting gun rights.
This video analyzes oral arguments in the Viramontes assault weapon ban case before the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner discusses potentially embarrassing questions from judges, the Bevis Test versus the Heller Test, the use of "expert reports," and why AR-15s were specifically focused on in the arguments. The content highlights the legal and constitutional aspects of Second Amendment challenges to "assault weapon" bans, offering insights from a constitutional attorney and publisher.
This video discusses the legal case Harrel v. Raoul concerning assault weapon bans, arguing for the Supreme Court to review the matter. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes the case, highlighting convincing arguments for its acceptance despite its non-final status. The video emphasizes the blatant actions of the State of Illinois and the 7th Circuit. It encourages viewers to educate themselves on Second Amendment rights and provides links to the Second Amendment Foundation and Washington Gun Law for further information and contact.
