This video discusses a significant legal victory where a Federal District Court Judge, Reed O'Connor, overturned an ATF rule. The judge criticized the ATF for overstepping its authority, bypassing the democratic process in redefinition, and violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The content highlights concerns about governmental overreach and administrative agency power.
This video discusses a significant legal development where a nationwide injunction was issued against the ATF's Pistol Brace Rule. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains the ruling in Britto v. ATF, focusing on the court's belief that the rule violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The content emphasizes the importance of staying informed about legal changes affecting Second Amendment rights and encourages viewers to seek further information and consultation.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzing the significant court ruling in Mock v. Garland concerning ATF's pistol brace regulations. The ruling found that the ATF's pistol brace rule violates both the Administrative Procedure Act and the Second Amendment. Kirk emphasizes this as the first instance of a court ruling the pistol brace rule infringes upon Second Amendment rights, aiming to educate viewers on the implications of this landmark decision.
This video discusses a federal appeals court ruling that found the ATF's rule reclassifying braced pistols as short-barreled rifles to be likely unlawful. The Fifth Circuit ruled that the ATF rule likely violates the Administrative Procedure Act. Gun owners who fail to comply with the rule could face felony charges. The Firearms Policy Coalition sued after the rule was announced. The video also promotes a giveaway and a USCCA referral program.
This video discusses a legal ruling by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that found the ATF's ban on pistol braces to be invalid. The court ruled that the ATF violated the Administrative Procedure Act, sending the case back to the lower court. The description emphasizes that this ruling represents a significant failure for the ATF's attempt to ban pistol braces.
This YouTube video discusses a significant legal ruling by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals that declared the ATF's pistol brace rule illegal. The court found the ATF violated the Administrative Procedure Act, effectively invalidating the rule and remanding it to a lower court. The video asserts this ruling signifies a major failure for the pistol brace ban.
Washington Gun Law President William Kirk discusses the implications of the ATF's pistol brace amnesty registration. He advises viewers to consider the ongoing lawsuits (Firearms Responsibility Accountability Coalition v. Garland, Mock v. Garland, and Britto v. ATF) and the potential impact of the Administrative Procedure Act before registering. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the matter rather than rushing to comply, highlighting that individual decisions might not be the best strategy given the legal challenges.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the first lawsuit, Mock v. Garland, filed against the ATF's new Pistol Brace Rule. The lawsuit, brought by the Firearms Policy Coalition, challenges the rule's legality under the Administrative Procedure Act. Kirk aims to educate viewers on the implications of this rule and the legal challenges being mounted against it, encouraging support for Second Amendment advocacy groups.
You've reached the end! 8 videos loaded.
