This video from Kentucky Ballistics tests the durability and effectiveness of Dragon Skin armor. While the description doesn't specify the firearms or calibers used, the context of testing armor strongly implies ballistic testing. The content is presented for entertainment and educational purposes, with a disclaimer advising viewers not to replicate the actions. The video promotes various Kentucky Ballistics affiliated channels and products, including their clothing line and Patreon.
This video appears to be a test or review of body armor purchased from Temu, a popular online marketplace. The title, 'Teste Supremo da Armadura Corporal Temu!', which translates to 'Supreme Test of Temu Body Armor!', strongly suggests a focus on the durability and effectiveness of this protective gear. While no specific firearms are mentioned, the context of body armor testing often implies its use in conjunction with firearms for personal defense scenarios. The video's content will likely revolve around subjectively assessing the armor's capabilities, potentially through impact tests or simulated use cases, to determine if it lives up to its 'supreme' claim.
This video tests the limits of RMA Defense Level III body armor by exposing it to threats it's not rated for, specifically M855 (Level III+) and 7.62x54R Light Ball (Level IV), at extended ranges up to 300 yards. The experiment aims to determine if reduced velocity and energy at longer distances allow the lightweight Level III plate to withstand these higher-threat rounds. The video also includes links to the manufacturer, Amazon, Patreon, and other social media platforms.
This video debunks common myths about RMA Body Armor by subjecting a Level IIIA polyethylene plate to extreme testing. Eddie from Brownells submerges the armor in a pond for a week, then blast it with a high-pressure fire hose. Finally, the plate is tested with Federal American Eagle XM193 5.56x45mm NATO rounds at close range. The video demonstrates that the RMA armor remains intact under these conditions, emphasizing its durability against water submersion and ballistic threats. The only failure occurred when fire was concentrated on a single spot, independent of water exposure. The video concludes with a score of 3-0 in favor of RMA armor against online 'keyboard jockeys' and asks viewers for future test suggestions.
This video features an extreme test of body armor's resistance against a .50 caliber rifle. The testers used a .50 caliber rifle to see how it would perform against body armor from Veterans Manufacturing, a company known for producing high-rated rifle protection. The video emphasizes the destructive power of the .50 caliber round and warns viewers that injuries from the impact alone could be fatal, even if the armor holds. Despite the extreme nature of the test, the armor is described as performing "amazingly." The video encourages viewers to visit the manufacturer's website for specific product specifications and offers a link to a Patreon for exclusive content and support.
This video tests the durability of ceramic composite body armor plates, challenging the common perception that they are fragile and only effective against a single shot. The test involves firing multiple rounds at an already used plate to assess its continued protective capabilities. The description also includes social media links for the channel.
You've reached the end! 6 videos loaded.
