This video, titled "Civilian Body Armor is Worthless," challenges the effectiveness of commonly available body armor for civilians. While the description doesn't provide specific details about the content of the video itself, it does include links to support the creator's Patreon, Venmo, and Instagram. The title strongly suggests a critical analysis or deconstruction of civilian body armor, likely involving discussions about its limitations against various threats or threats it's not designed to stop. The focus appears to be on the perceived inadequacy of civilian-grade ballistic protection.
This video explores the ballistic resistance of a Barbuda helmet, referencing medieval testing methodologies. While the title explicitly mentions a 'Medieval TEST,' it also uses the term 'BULLETPROOF,' implying a modern ballistic test is likely conducted or at least discussed. The content appears to be an evaluation of historical armor's effectiveness against modern threats, which would appeal to firearm enthusiasts interested in ballistics, historical weaponry, and protective gear.
This video likely investigates the effectiveness of angled armor against the powerful 50 BMG cartridge. It may involve testing or simulations to demonstrate how well angled plating can deflect or penetrate such a high-caliber round. The content will appeal to those interested in ballistics, armor penetration, and military or survival applications of firearms and protective materials. The creator's social media links suggest a focus on dynamic and engaging content.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
