This video analyzes the legal decision in United States v. Peterson concerning the National Firearms Act (NFA) and its restrictions on suppressors. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk discusses how the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, while potentially moving away from its earlier stance, still upheld the constitutionality of the NFA's suppressor regulations. The content suggests that even the 5th Circuit may have reached its limit in challenging Second Amendment protections in this specific context, urging viewers to educate themselves on the matter.
This video discusses the legal and constitutional challenges to birthright citizenship in the United States, specifically focusing on the potential impact of the Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explores the historical context of the 14th Amendment and whether its application to children of undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes can be overturned. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides links to relevant legal documents and resources, including information on self-defense protection plans from "Right to Bear."
This video analyzes the critical juncture of the Duncan v. Bonta case as it reaches the U.S. Supreme Court's conference. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the significance of the conference, the factors Justices consider, and how Duncan compares to other Second Amendment petitions like Wolford and the marijuana-possession case. The discussion highlights the unprecedented activity on the Supreme Court's firearms docket in modern history and explores the need for clearer guidance following the Bruen decision, potential outcomes for Duncan, and judicial resistance in lower courts. It also encourages viewers to support CRPA.
This video explores the philosophical and historical origins of the Second Amendment, tracing it back to the natural right of self-preservation rather than solely the Constitution. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses an amicus brief in the Wolford v. Lopez case, highlighting the fundamental importance of this right. The content aims to educate viewers about the core principles behind gun ownership and its connection to self-defense, encouraging them to "arm themselves with education."
This video analyzes Hawaii's controversial law that allegedly bans concealed carry without explicitly stating a ban. The description highlights how the state manipulated signage rules, effectively turning the entire state into a no-carry zone by default. It discusses the legal implications, mentioning the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement through the Wolford v. Lopez case and Attorney General Pam Bondi's stance that the law is unconstitutional. The content suggests this tactic could be used by other blue states to circumvent Second Amendment rights and explores the motivations behind such legislation. Additionally, the video promotes merchandise related to gun rights and freedom.
This video discusses recent Supreme Court orders related to Second Amendment cases. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes what decisions were made (or not made) regarding gun rights cases before the court. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these legal matters and promotes a self-defense protection service called 'Right to Bear,' offering legal protection for various self-defense scenarios, including firearm use. It also directs viewers to Washington Gun Law's resources for further information and engagement.
This video, titled 'The Founders PREDICTED The ATF - And They Tried To Stop It!', explores the historical perspective of the Founding Fathers regarding federal government overreach and the potential dangers of agencies like the ATF. The content suggests that the Founders, through their writings and warnings, anticipated the current landscape of unelected bureaucrats creating and enforcing regulations that could infringe upon liberty. The video aims to highlight these historical warnings and their relevance to contemporary issues concerning gun rights and government authority.
This video features William Kirk of Washington Gun Law and Kostas Moros from the Second Amendment Foundation engaging in their monthly discussion. The conversation centers around various issues pertaining to Second Amendment litigation, offering insights into legal challenges and advocacy related to gun rights in the United States.
This video discusses 41 Second Amendment cases currently before the Supreme Court, highlighting the potential impact on gun rights. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law breaks down the cases ahead of the "orders list" to educate viewers on the "bloodbath" that may occur. The description also promotes "Right to Bear," a self-defense protection service offering legal assistance and other benefits, with a discount code provided. Viewers are encouraged to subscribe to newsletters and social media channels for ongoing updates on gun law and rights.
This video discusses the constitutionality of Oregon Ballot Measure 114, which is currently before the State Supreme Court. The content features an interview with Oregon Attorney Tony Aiello Jr., who represented gun owners during the oral arguments. The discussion aims to inform viewers about the implications of the court's decision on Oregon's gun rights and the future of firearm ownership in the state. Links are provided to watch the oral arguments and to support the cause.
This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to review two separate cases challenging AR-15 "assault weapon" bans. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, analyzes the legal implications of these cases for gun owners and the broader fight for Second Amendment rights. The discussion touches upon the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty and Smith's extensive background in firearms law and advocacy.
This video analyzes a new city ordinance in St. Paul, Minnesota, that prohibits firearms. The speaker, William Kirk from Washington Gun Law, argues that this ordinance is likely unconstitutional due to state preemption laws, which prevent local governments from enacting firearm regulations that conflict with state law. Kirk explains the implications of these preemption laws and asserts that the St. Paul ordinance is essentially invalid, advising citizens in St. Paul and elsewhere not to be concerned about its enforceability. The video aims to educate viewers about their Second Amendment rights and the legal landscape of firearm regulations.
