This video discusses a new criminal charge in Washington D.C. involving a pistol brace, which the presenter argues sets a dangerous precedent for all gun owners. The charge stems from an individual being prosecuted twice for the same firearm, once as a pistol and again as a short-barreled rifle under the National Firearms Act. The content highlights the organization's efforts, in conjunction with the Firearms Regulatory Policy Coalition, to combat this legal development.
This video appears to document instances of road rage, with the title suggesting a potential firearms-related escalation in the first incident. The second incident is described as a group of people who will 'FAFO' (F*ck Around and Find Out) someday, implying a potential future confrontation or a situation where consequences are expected. Given the mention of an 'M charge' (likely referring to a felony charge related to firearms) and the aggressive tone of the description, the content is likely focused on volatile confrontations and potential firearm involvement.
This video analyzes a federal judge's decision to uphold a criminal charge for lying on a Form 4473, even after dismissing the underlying charge of possessing a firearm while under a domestic restraining order. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discusses the nuances of the "material term" concept in relation to the Form 4473 and raises questions about the judicial interpretation, referencing key legal cases like Collins v. Yellen and United States v. Combs. The analysis delves into the statutory language and explores potential Second Amendment implications.
This video discusses a significant Second Amendment victory where a Federal District Court in West Virginia declared a federal gun control law (18 USC 922k) unconstitutional. The court found that the law, which bans firearms with obliterated serial numbers, lacked the necessary historical analogue to pass Second Amendment scrutiny. While the charge related to the obliterated serial number was dismissed, a charge for being a felon in possession of a firearm was allowed to proceed. The analysis features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, highlighting his expertise and past legal work, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty.
You've reached the end! 4 videos loaded.