This video discusses the legal ramifications for parents when their children bring firearms to school, referencing two specific cases in Wisconsin and North Carolina. It explores the complex issue of parental responsibility versus criminal liability, and how safe storage laws can be perceived as an "attack on gun ownership." The content aims to foster a nuanced conversation about gun rights and responsibility.
This YouTube video explores a legal theory concerning the potential criminal liability of Washington State Attorney General Ferguson following his public statements regarding the "Three Bob Race." The content, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, is explicitly theoretical and aims to delve into lesser-discussed legal concepts. While acknowledging the AG's reaction is subject to public scrutiny, the video focuses on whether criminal charges could be pursued. The creators encourage viewer engagement for future video ideas and provide contact information for legal inquiries related to Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses the legal ramifications of the Oxford High School shooting, specifically focusing on the mother of the perpetrator being found guilty for her son's crime. The title implies a discussion about 'Government Mandated Responsibility' in relation to gun violence and parental liability. The description includes links to merchandise, a backup YouTube channel, and patron support pages, indicating it's from a content creator with an established audience and a focus on viewer funding rather than traditional sponsorships. The content appears to be a commentary or news analysis rather than a direct firearm review or demonstration.
This video breaks down the ATF's Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces and its critical intersection with Washington State gun laws. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explains the potential criminal liability faced by individuals in Washington State under both federal and state law depending on their compliance choices with the new rule. The video emphasizes the importance of education to navigate these complex legal implications and provides links to applicable statutes and related resources.
William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explains what to do if your firearm is stolen, focusing on RCW 9.41.360 (Washington's Safe Storage Provisions). He clarifies that this law doesn't mandate specific storage methods but imposes criminal liability for irresponsible storage leading to harm or criminal activity. Kirk highlights a crucial 'escape hatch' for responsible gun owners and encourages viewers to educate themselves on this important legal aspect. The video references an original news story from King 5 about a stolen gun in Tacoma and provides links to relevant Washington State Revised Code (RCW) statutes.
This video, "Bullet Points. Pointing a Firearm at Someone Else in Washington," features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law. He explains the legal circumstances under which pointing or aiming a firearm at another person may be permissible in Washington State, emphasizing the severe criminal liability involved if done without lawful authority. The discussion is intended to educate lawful and responsible gun owners on this critical aspect of firearm law, providing knowledge in a concise format. It references specific Revised Code of Washington (RCW) statutes related to firearms and assault.
This video analyzes a real-life incident where a delivery driver in Duvall, WA, pulled a gun on an unarmed man on January 22, 2022. Hosted by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, the content delves into the lead-up to the event, dissecting right and wrong actions, potential legal ramifications, and crucially, the driver's alarming disregard for firearm safety rules. The video aims to educate viewers on what NOT to do by using this case as a "Real Life Lesson." Legal statutes relevant to the incident in Washington State are referenced, along with other informational videos on firearm display and pointing.
This video discusses the legal ramifications of stray bullets hitting a neighbor's property during a home invasion. Criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve and USCCA Director of Content Kevin Michalowski explain potential criminal and civil liabilities. They emphasize that gun owners are responsible for every round fired and advise knowing state and local gun laws, understanding concepts like Castle Doctrine, and identifying safer firing zones within the home. The video highlights that even without criminal charges, civil lawsuits are a possibility.
This video discusses the parallels between regulating physical weapons and regulating digital threats like malware. It argues that technology itself is neutral, and its impact is determined by its use. The description criticizes regulatory approaches driven by ignorance and fear, drawing a comparison to past attempts to hold firearms manufacturers liable for misuse of their products. The discussion emphasizes that such laws are often ineffective and disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens while failing to deter malicious actors. The video features a roundtable discussion with cybersecurity experts.
You've reached the end! 9 videos loaded.
