This video analyzes Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissenting opinion in the Trump v. Casa case. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, criticizes her opinion as petulant and mimicking talking points from "The View." He suggests this signals a potentially turbulent tenure for her on the Supreme Court, particularly concerning Second Amendment rights. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on legal matters affecting their rights and provides contact information for legal assistance.
This YouTube video delves into a significant legal development concerning the Second Amendment, specifically highlighting a dissenting opinion from a US Court of Appeals judge against the Ninth Circuit's ruling on an Hawaiian arm ban challenge. The judge criticizes the court for its handling of Second Amendment cases. The analysis likely focuses on legal arguments, constitutional rights, and the interpretation of gun laws, drawing connections to landmark cases and the evolving landscape of gun litigation post-Bruen.
This video discusses a controversial ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of U.S. v. Duarte. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law breaks down the perceived 'gamesmanship' within the court, highlighting a dissenting opinion from a 9th Circuit Justice that strongly criticizes the majority's decision. The content promotes education on Second Amendment rights and offers legal protection services through 'Right to Bear'.
This video criticizes Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor's understanding of firearms, specifically in the context of a dissenting opinion on a bump stock ban case. The author argues that her opinion demonstrates a lack of knowledge regarding firearm mechanics and functionality.
This video analyzes the dissent in the Cargill case from Justice Sotomayor, arguing that her wording has effectively halted any potential AR bans. The content focuses on a legal interpretation that impacts firearm rights, specifically concerning the AR platform. The description highlights Sotomayor's dissent as the pivotal factor in preventing AR bans.
This video analyzes the dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court case Cargill v. Garland, focusing on the liberal justices' arguments regarding Second Amendment rights. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, from Four Boxes Diner, introduces his theory of "duckualism" to explain the dissent's reasoning. The content highlights Mark Smith's background as a Supreme Court Bar member, professor, and author of several books on gun rights and political conspiracies. The analysis aims to equip viewers with knowledge to defend their liberties by understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box, emphasizing Bill of Rights news and analysis.
This video breaks down a significant Second Amendment victory in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning the right to bear arms in public for young adults. The analysis focuses on the dissenting opinion of Judge Luis Restrepo and highlights three key errors in his legal reasoning. The content is presented by Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, a constitutional attorney with extensive experience and publications related to Second Amendment rights.
William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the Duncan v. Bonta ruling from the 9th Circuit Court, focusing on the dissenting opinions. He argues that the ruling reflects a corrupt political agenda undermining constitutional rights. The video aims to educate viewers on the implications of this decision for Second Amendment rights and encourages them to seek further information and resources from Washington Gun Law.
This video analyzes a significant Second Amendment case decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The court denied an en banc review of a case involving a criminal defendant charged under 18 USC 922(g)(1), the law prohibiting felons from possessing firearms. However, four dissenting judges strongly questioned the constitutionality of this law, suggesting it could become a major Supreme Court case. The analysis delves into the legal arguments, historical parallels, and potential implications for Second Amendment rights.
You've reached the end! 9 videos loaded.
