This video discusses a significant legal ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concerning federal gun laws and prohibited persons. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner analyzes the decision, which states that individuals who use drugs cannot be prohibited from owning firearms. The video covers the background of the case, the court's findings, and its reasoning on the dangerousness of drug users in relation to the Second Amendment. The content focuses on legal analysis and Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a significant Second Amendment legal development, focusing on Minnesota's attempt to avoid a US Supreme Court ruling in the Worth v. Jacobson case. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes the state's strategy of filing for en banc review by the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The case centers on the rights of 18-20 year olds to carry handguns in public for self-defense. The discussion touches upon the broader implications for gun rights and contrasts with the recent Rahimi case.
This video provides a breakdown of the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's oral arguments in the Worth v. Jacobson case, focusing on its implications for Second Amendment rights. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner analyzes the proceedings, highlighting that the arguments did not favor anti-gun advocates. The discussion covers case history, the judges involved, the anti-gun strategy, and a critique of the government's response, particularly concerning the burden of proof. The video also touches on historical analogues and a potential solution to a mootness issue, emphasizing its relevance to gun owners' liberties.
This video analyzes a significant Second Amendment case decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The court denied an en banc review of a case involving a criminal defendant charged under 18 USC 922(g)(1), the law prohibiting felons from possessing firearms. However, four dissenting judges strongly questioned the constitutionality of this law, suggesting it could become a major Supreme Court case. The analysis delves into the legal arguments, historical parallels, and potential implications for Second Amendment rights.
You've reached the end! 4 videos loaded.
