This video covers a significant Second Amendment (2A) legal development: the Supreme Court's denial of Certiorari in Oakland Tactical v. Howell Township. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discusses the implications of this decision, which originated from the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The content delves into the "Right To Train" issue and explains the unique functions of the Supreme Court and the rationale behind their decision, emphasizing the distinction between importance and precedential value. The video aims to provide "hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis" from the perspective of "The Four Boxes Diner."
This video discusses the Supreme Court petition in Oakland Tactical Supply v. Howell Township, a case with significant implications for Second Amendment rights. The core issue involves a township rezoning its entire jurisdiction to prevent Second Amendment activities not through legislation, but through zoning ordinances. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains the importance of this case and encourages viewers to educate themselves on the matter. The video also promotes TacPack, the Firearms Policy Coalition, and provides contact information for Washington Gun Law.
This video analyzes a US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruling that restrictions on a proposed 1,000-yard shooting range did not violate the Second Amendment. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner breaks down the case, focusing on the "right to train" and the court's application of tiers of scrutiny. The analysis touches on historical parallels and legal examples. The video aims to inform gun owners about legal challenges impacting their rights.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
