This video discusses a court ruling in favor of Palmetto State Armory (PSA) regarding their Micro Dagger magazine. Shield Arms had alleged patent infringement, but the court found decisively in PSA's favor, even invalidating Shield Arms' patent claims. PSA emphasizes their commitment to innovation and protecting their intellectual property, stating they did not initiate this legal challenge but defended their products when necessary.
This video discusses a concerning situation where a large government contractor, CENTRE, has allegedly patented the concept of 3D printed suppressors and is attempting to extort a smaller company, Otter Creek Labs, by claiming infringement. The video highlights the legal dispute and the implications for innovation in the suppressor industry, referencing legal analysis from Stamboulieh Law and providing links to relevant patents.
This video addresses allegations that the 'Super Safety' infringes on existing US patents. The creator provides links to three specific patents (US12038247B2, US7398723B1, US10514223B1) for viewers to research themselves. The video also links to the 'Super Safety release video' for additional context on the product. The focus is on the legal and patent aspects surrounding the Super Safety device, rather than its direct firearm application or performance.
This video delves into the complex patent issues surrounding the Sig P320 pistol. While the description doesn't explicitly detail the patent drama, it suggests a deep dive into intellectual property disputes related to this popular firearm. The content is likely aimed at firearm enthusiasts interested in the legal and technical aspects of gun manufacturing and design.
This video features an interview with Tim Parlatore, former lawyer for President Trump and current lawyer for Montana Knife Company (MKC), and Josh Smith, co-founder of MKC. They discuss the ongoing Benchmade lawsuit, delving into the legal aspects and potential future developments. The conversation likely explores the intricacies of intellectual property disputes within the knife manufacturing industry, given the involvement of a prominent knife company and its legal representation.
This video discusses a lawsuit filed by Benchmade against Montana Knife Company (MKC). It delves into the history of Benchmade, their legal history, MKC's response to the lawsuit, and Benchmade's motion. The video appears to be an analysis of a legal dispute within the knife industry, with potential implications for intellectual property and design rights.
This video delves into the ongoing lawsuit between GWACS Armory LLC and KE Arms, along with other defendants including Brownells and specific individuals. The content creator, from Forgotten Weapons, offers their perspective on the legal proceedings, which they have been aware of since its inception. The discussion touches upon the legal aspects of the case and provides links to supporting documentation and discussions, including AR15.com threads, GWACS's public statements regarding tooling and inventory, and court filings.
This video, "Gun Law 101: Patents," hosted by MattLaAtLaw from Fuddbusters, delves into the intricacies of firearm patents. It aims to clarify what constitutes a patent, what it doesn't, and why relatively few firearms are patented. The content also touches upon the FRT litigation. The video encourages viewers to support Fuddbusters through various platforms like Patreon, Utreon, and SubscribeStar, and offers merchandise. Affiliate links are provided for related books and a 3D printer setup, suggesting a focus on the intersection of firearm technology, law, and potentially DIY firearm creation or modification. The host expresses a desire to combat misinformation and critique those who hinder gun rights.
This video discusses the lawsuit filed by Nike against StockX for allegedly selling counterfeit sneaker NFTs. Nike claims StockX is selling unauthorized virtual versions of their products, creating a situation where consumers may believe they are purchasing genuine goods from an authorized seller. The video touches upon the intersection of intellectual property rights, digital assets, and the burgeoning NFT market, highlighting potential legal challenges and consumer protection concerns within this new space.
This YouTube video discusses Nike's trademarking of the Air Jordan 1 design and its implications for the market of bootleg and 'Unauthorized Authentic' (UA) sneakers. The creator invites donations and promotes their social media channels and Twitch stream. The focus is on the legal and market impact of intellectual property protection within the sneaker resale and counterfeit industry.
This video, "FUDDBUSTERS: 3D Printing, Copyright, and the CASE Act - Did Congress stop 3d printing?", hosted by @MattLaAtLaw, delves into the impact of recent legislation, specifically the CASE Act, on 3D printing technology, with a particular focus on its implications for firearms manufacturing and intellectual property. The host aims to demystify rumors surrounding Congress's actions and separate fact from fiction. Viewers are encouraged to become 'fuddbusters' by purchasing merchandise.
This video discusses a legal dispute involving Warren Lotas and Nike, specifically a counter-lawsuit. The title also raises the question of whether Warren Lotas has implicated Jeff Staple in the situation. The description provides links for donations, channel memberships, and social media follows, along with a Karmaloop referral code. The content appears to be commentary or news coverage of a business/legal conflict within the fashion and sneaker industry.
