This video analyzes a recent US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruling that allegedly relied on a non-existent North Carolina law to restrict Second Amendment rights. Host Mark Smith breaks down the 260-page opinion, highlighting the argument that the cited statute was never adopted and, even if it had been, its original intent was to prevent terrorism, not peaceful firearm carry. The analysis draws comparisons to the New York "sensitive places" law and references the US Supreme Court's stance in NYSRPA v. Bruen, emphasizing that historical ambiguity should favor Second Amendment protections. Further proof from State v. Huntly is presented to demonstrate the historical ineffectiveness of the alleged law.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
