This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes a significant legal ruling in NAGR v. Garland. The ruling grants an injunction against the ATF's enforcement of Operation Reticent Recall, commonly known as the Forced Reset Trigger Confiscation Mission. The discussion delves into the scope and immediate impact of this injunction for gun owners, emphasizing education and understanding of Second Amendment rights. The video encourages viewers to support the National Association for Gun Rights and provides contact information for Washington Gun Law for legal inquiries.
William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the ATF's "Operation Reticent Recall," a national effort to seize solvent traps, forced reset triggers, and "wide open triggers." The ATF is reclassifying these previously authorized items as unlawful machine guns. The video explains three categories individuals may fall into if they purchased these triggers and advises on necessary actions. It references applicable statutes (26 U.S.C. Sec. 5845 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001) and links to related videos on destroying triggers and ATF actions.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the ATF's "Operation Reticent Recall" concerning solvent traps, forced reset triggers, and wide-open triggers. He explains how the ATF is reclassifying these items as unlawful machine guns and how purchasers may fall into one of three categories. Kirk advises viewers on what actions to take based on their situation, emphasizing the importance of education regarding their Second Amendment rights. The video references relevant statutes (26 U.S.C. Sec. 5845 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001) and links to other related YouTube videos.
William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the ATF's "Operation Reticent Recall," a campaign targeting solvent traps, forced reset triggers, and now "wide open triggers." The ATF has reclassified these items as unlawful machine guns, despite previously authorizing their sale. The video highlights the ATF's new approach to connecting previously unconnected dots, urging viewers to educate themselves on the implications for their Second Amendment rights. Contact information for legal consultation is provided.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, dissecting the Cargill v. Garland case from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. The ruling determined the ATF lacked lawful authority to ban bump stocks. Kirk explains the broader implications of this decision beyond bump stocks, specifically how it impacts the ATF's ongoing efforts to regulate firearms equipped with stabilizing braces and their reversal on forced reset triggers, leading to 'Operation Reticent Recall.' The video emphasizes educating viewers to understand these significant legal developments and their effect on firearm ownership.
William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the ATF's recent actions regarding forced reset triggers (FRTs), particularly Operation Reticent Recall. The video focuses on a client, B.W., who surrendered an FRT and received a letter offering a chance to protest forfeiture or seek compensation. Kirk questions whether this is a genuine recognition of the 5th Amendment's Takings Clause or a trap to establish ownership of now-prohibited items. The discussion includes relevant statutes (26 U.S.C. Sec. 5872, 26 U.S.C. Sec. 5845) and constitutional amendments (5th Amendment), as well as legal precedents like McHutchen v. United States. Resources from the ATF and Congress are also referenced.
This video features William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discussing the ATF's "Operation Reticent Recall," focusing on their efforts to confiscate specific firearm components, particularly triggers and solvent traps. Kirk advises viewers NOT to answer ATF questions when surrendering property, explaining the implications of these inquiries and the importance of education. The video references relevant statutes and other resources, including ATF open letters and related YouTube content.
This video analyzes the Supreme Court's decision to deny review of two bump stock cases, GOA v. Garland. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains what this means for the ATF's ban on bump stocks, which was enacted after the 2017 Las Vegas shooting. The denial signifies the Court's current stance on bump fire technology and suggests a continued willingness to let ATF's regulations stand. The discussion also touches on the broader implications for future legal challenges to firearm accessory bans and emphasizes the importance of staying informed.
This video discusses the controversial notion that the ATF's "Operation Reticent Recall" is a de facto national gun registry. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law argues that by classifying certain triggers and solvent traps as NFA regulated firearms and then seizing them, the ATF has used government resources to compile data on their sale. This data, he contends, is now in a searchable format for enforcement, effectively creating a registry funded by taxpayers, despite federal prohibition on such databases.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing "Operation Reticent Recall," a national initiative by the ATF to collect specific firearm triggers and traps. Kirk explains his ongoing communication with hundreds of lawful gun owners and nearly a dozen ATF agents regarding this operation. The video aims to educate viewers on how to navigate this situation by providing up-to-date information and encouraging them to "arm yourself with education."
You've reached the end! 10 videos loaded.
