This video analyzes the oral arguments in the US Supreme Court case regarding presidential immunity for former President Donald Trump, specifically concerning actions taken while in office. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith breaks down key moments from the hearing, discussing legal concepts like 'malum in se' vs. 'malum prohibitum,' the implications of impeachment, and historical precedents. The content is presented from the perspective of the 'Four Boxes Diner,' which focuses on Second Amendment news and analysis, advocating for an understanding of liberty through various societal mechanisms.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
