This video analyzes a significant legal filing by the Second Amendment Foundation and the Firearms Policy Coalition challenging New York's "assault weapon" ban in the case of Lane v. Rocha. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discusses the motion for summary judgment, focusing on legal arguments related to the Second Amendment, the definition of "arms" in common use, and the burden of proof shifting to the government. The analysis delves into proving "common use" and the issue of "unprecedented societal change" as it relates to gun bans. The content emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty.
William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the significant case of Williams v. Garland, which has been ongoing for six years. The case centers on a plaintiff's permanent inability to restore his Second Amendment rights due to multiple DUI arrests in Pennsylvania. The plaintiff sought summary judgment, arguing that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to his situation. The US District Court has ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring the statute unconstitutional in this instance. The video emphasizes the importance of this 11-page opinion for understanding potential future legal outcomes in similar cases and encourages viewers to educate themselves on their rights. The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) is highlighted for their crucial advocacy in this case.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the legal case Williams v. Garland. The case challenges 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(1), which prohibits firearm possession for individuals convicted of crimes punishable by a year or more in jail, regardless of the offense's nature. The video highlights the specific instance of Mr. Williams' DUI conviction, where no harm occurred, and connects it to broader legal efforts to re-examine prohibitions on non-violent offenders. The discussion aims to educate viewers on the potential significant impact this case could have on hundreds of thousands of Americans and their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses the Wiese v. Bonta case, a legal challenge against California's magazine ban. Hosted by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, the discussion highlights the significance of this case, which was filed prior to Duncan v. Bonta and seeks the "summary judgment" remedy. The content aims to educate viewers on the potential impact of this lawsuit on Second Amendment rights, particularly concerning magazine capacity restrictions. Viewers are encouraged to contact Washington Gun Law for further information.
You've reached the end! 4 videos loaded.
