M16A2 to 500yds: Practical Accuracy ...was Eugene Stoner wrong? [ USMC experiences in Iraq ]
This video analyzes the M16A2 rifle, focusing on its practical accuracy at 500 yards and questioning Eugene Stoner's criticisms of its design modifications, particularly the rear sight. It features insights from a U.S. Marine veteran who served in Iraq and Fallujah, discussing the rifle's combat effectiveness, operational philosophy, and the rationale behind the M16A2's features. The discussion delves into the M16A1 vs. M16A2 changes, engagement distances, close-quarters combat use, and the role of iron sights in military operations, ultimately exploring whether Stoner's critique of the M16A2's rear sight was justified.
![M16A2 to 500yds: Practical Accuracy ...was Eugene Stoner wrong? [ USMC experiences in Iraq ]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FsqOiTXmi1QU%2Fhqdefault.jpg&w=3840&q=75)









