This video analyzes a landmark unanimous decision by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding federal machine gun bans. While upholding the ban, the ruling establishes a legal precedent based on the 'common use' test from Heller, potentially protecting widely-owned semi-automatic firearms like AR-15s from future bans. The decision distinguishes between machine guns and commonly-owned firearms, impacting Second Amendment jurisprudence and gun owner rights.
This video analyzes the implications of the Bruen case on firearm possession for marijuana users, specifically referencing the United States v. Harrison ruling that struck down 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(3). The discussion highlights that despite this ruling, federal law still prohibits firearm possession by marijuana users as it categorizes marijuana similarly to other illicit substances. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explains how the Bruen decision is prompting courts to re-evaluate restrictive firearm laws and their historical justifications. The video aims to educate viewers on the current legal landscape regarding marijuana and firearm ownership.
This video discusses the ongoing efforts in New York to enact gun control measures, even after the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. It highlights a specific proposed law that would make it a felony to carry a firearm into places of worship. The content also mentions that some pastors in upstate New York are actively opposing these measures and advocating for their right to self-defense and the protection of their congregations. The video promotes the USCCA for gun owners seeking peace of mind and a referral program for existing members.
This video discusses the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling on June 23rd, 2022, which struck down New York's concealed carry laws. The ruling, stemming from the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen case, is presented as a significant victory for gun owners nationwide. The host, Dustin, breaks down the implications of this decision for the present and future.
This video announcement teases an upcoming discussion or analysis related to the 'Bruen case.' Given the title's immediate follow-up to the case dropping, it strongly suggests the content will focus on the legal and constitutional implications of the Supreme Court's decision, particularly as it pertains to Second Amendment rights and firearm regulations. Users can expect a detailed breakdown of the ruling and its potential impact.
This video challenges the notion that Second Amendment rights should differ for city dwellers compared to rural Americans. It argues against a new anti-gun argument being pushed in the Supreme Court, specifically in the Bruen case, which suggests urban populations don't warrant the same right to bear arms. The content highlights that over 80% of Americans live in urban areas and discusses the hypocrisy of accepting gun ownership in rural areas while denying it in cities. It also points out that public defender groups, including those representing minority communities, have denounced these restrictions as unconstitutional and harmful.
This video features Attorney Chuck Michel from the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) and the Second Amendment Law Center discussing the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association vs. Bruen case argued before the Supreme Court. Michel expresses optimism for a significant win, likely related to Second Amendment rights. The description also promotes various organizations, merchandise, training, and social media channels associated with the host, GunGuyTV.
This video discusses the Supreme Court oral arguments in the NYSRPA v. Bruen case, which challenges New York's "may issue" concealed carry permit system. The creator shares their thoughts on the proceedings and the potential outcome. The description also includes promotional links for supplements, gold, and body armor, as well as a link to support the channel. Additional links are provided to SCOTUSblog, a related YouTube video, and the official Supreme Court oral arguments transcript and audio.
A constitutional attorney breaks down the Second Amendment, focusing on the plain text and its implications for the right to bear arms. The video contrasts the attorney's interpretation with 'anti-gunner' arguments, particularly regarding the meaning of 'to bear arms' and 'the people.' It explores the historical context and legal precedents, such as the Heller decision, to argue that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry firearms outside the home for self-defense, not just for militia service.
You've reached the end! 9 videos loaded.
