This YouTube video discusses the Supreme Court's decision (or lack thereof) to grant certiorari in major Second Amendment cases. The title indicates that the SCOTUS is still not granting cert, meaning they haven't agreed to hear the cases yet. This is a significant development for gun rights advocates and those following legal challenges to gun control laws. The content likely delves into the implications of this decision for existing or future Second Amendment litigation.
This video discusses the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the Snope v Brown case. The content creator expresses strong disapproval, interpreting the decision as the Court prioritizing 'illegal aliens' over the Second Amendment and deeming 100,000 Americans as 'second-class citizens.' The description also promotes CGW's social media presence and a 'Gun of the Week' feature.
This video discusses a significant new order from the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the Second Amendment and gun rights. The order directs Delaware to respond to a petition for certiorari in the Jennings v. Gray case. The timing of this order is analyzed for its potential impact on whether the Supreme Court will hear the Snope semiautomatic rifle ban case. The content delves into the background of these cases, circuit splits regarding preliminary injunctions, and the procedural aspects of the Supreme Court's process. The analysis highlights the importance of this news for gun owners and Second Amendment advocates, referencing legal concepts like the 'four boxes' of American liberty.
This video discusses a significant legal development concerning the Second Amendment. The Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation are seeking a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court in a case that addresses preliminary injunction standards. Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and commentator, breaks down the key elements required for a preliminary injunction and how they apply to Second Amendment cases. He explains how the measurement of harm in these cases is crucial and how the current petition aims to advance the rights of gun owners. The discussion is framed within the broader context of defending constitutional liberties.
This video discusses breaking news from the US Supreme Court regarding the Lara v. Commissioner of PA State Police case. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes a legal brief filed by the Lara plaintiffs, arguing against the Supreme Court hearing the case (denial of certiorari). Smith explains why this outcome could be beneficial for Second Amendment rights and touches upon potential internal disputes within the Supreme Court concerning gun rights. The content is presented by "The Four Boxes Diner," a platform focused on Second Amendment news and analysis from a constitutional legal perspective.
This YouTube video discusses the potential implications of recent US Supreme Court actions on Second Amendment rights, specifically focusing on two firearms-related cases, 'US v. Rahimi' and two other 18 USC 922g cases ('Range' and 'Daniels'). The host, Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, breaks down how the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear (granting cert) and analyzes quotes from a DOJ brief in relation to 'US v. Daniels'. The video aims to update viewers on the current legal landscape affecting gun ownership and rights, highlighting the dynamic between different legal interpretations and their impact on gun owners.
This video discusses a significant legal development concerning bump stocks. The Supreme Court has denied a certiorari petition in a major case challenging the ATF's regulation of bump stocks. The analysis delves into the implications of this denial, touching upon the Chevron doctrine and the procedural history of the case, including its numerous postponements. The presenter suggests reasons why the denial might have occurred and explores the potential impact on gun owners' rights, offering a perspective that despite the immediate setback, there might be a silver lining or alternative avenues for victory. The video aims to provide Second Amendment news and analysis from a constitutional attorney.
This video covers the CRPA's petition to the US Supreme Court in the Duncan v. Bonta case. The lawsuit challenges California's ban on magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition, marking a significant legal battle over 'large-capacity magazines'. The petition for certiorari was filed on February 28, 2022, and this case represents a crucial moment in the ongoing legal fight for Second Amendment rights related to firearm magazine capacity.
You've reached the end! 8 videos loaded.