This video discusses the Supreme Court case US v. Hemani, which concerns the prohibition of firearm ownership for users of controlled substances, specifically focusing on federal law (18 US Code, Section 922(g)(3)) versus state legality of cannabis. The analysis highlights the Gun Owners of America's (GOA) involvement and criticizes the Department of Justice's choice of a terror suspect as the plaintiff in this case, suggesting potential consequences for gun owners regarding their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses the Supreme Court case United States v. Hemani, which centers on whether individuals who use marijuana or other controlled substances should lose their Second Amendment right to bear arms. The Biden DOJ is defending the ban, while a previous Fifth Circuit ruling struck it down. The content creator, Jared from Guns & Gadgets, breaks down the legal aspects, filings, and potential implications for gun owners nationwide.
This video discusses the ongoing legal challenge to the federal law prohibiting individuals who use controlled substances from possessing firearms. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, details the case of United States v. Daniels, which has seen lower-level successes for the challengers but is now being petitioned for review by the Supreme Court by the DOJ. The video highlights a 'real twist' that could significantly alter the case's outcome, urging viewers to arm themselves with education on this critical Second Amendment issue.
This video discusses the legal implications of the United States v. Rahimi case and its impact on 18 USC Section 922(g)(3), which prohibits individuals who use controlled substances from possessing firearms. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law argues that the Rahimi ruling contains problematic language that could be broadly applied to restrict gun rights, mirroring challenges seen in cases like Cooper v. Attorney General and US v. Daniels. The content aims to educate viewers on these legal developments and their potential consequences for Second Amendment rights.
William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the significant court case United States v. Alston. This case challenges federal restrictions on firearm possession for individuals under felony indictment and those who use controlled substances. Kirk highlights the case's importance as a preview of issues likely to reach the Supreme Court, offering insights into the future of Second Amendment rights. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these critical legal developments and provides contact information for legal assistance.
This video discusses the Fifth Circuit's ruling in *US v. Daniels*, which struck down a federal law (18 U.S.C. Section 922(g)(3)) that prohibits unlawful users of controlled substances from possessing firearms. The court found that the law, as applied to Patrick Daniels who used marijuana multiple days per month, violated the Second Amendment because the government presented no evidence of his intoxication at the time of arrest and the historical tradition of firearm regulation does not support disarming sober citizens based solely on past drug usage. The video explains how this decision relates to the *Bruen* analysis and mentions the case of Hunter Biden in the context of Second Amendment rights.
You've reached the end! 6 videos loaded.
