Proof That They're Going to Shove Rahimi Down Our Throats
This video discusses the legal implications of the United States v. Rahimi case and its impact on 18 USC Section 922(g)(3), which prohibits individuals who use controlled substances from possessing firearms. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law argues that the Rahimi ruling contains problematic language that could be broadly applied to restrict gun rights, mirroring challenges seen in cases like Cooper v. Attorney General and US v. Daniels. The content aims to educate viewers on these legal developments and their potential consequences for Second Amendment rights.












