This video discusses the legal battle surrounding California's ammunition background check law (Prop 63) following a defeat for the state in the Rhode v. Bonta case. California has filed for an en banc review at the Ninth Circuit, aiming to overturn a recent victory for Second Amendment advocates. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the state's legal strategy, the Ninth Circuit's political landscape, and the potential national impact on gun owners and Second Amendment litigation. The discussion also touches on historical legal arguments, state tactics to delay constitutional rulings, the potential role of the Supreme Court, and ways for supporters to aid the CRPA in their legal efforts.
This video breaks down the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Rhode v. Bonta, which declared California's ammunition background check system unconstitutional. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains how Proposition 63 became a rights-restricting law, why the court labeled it a "background check scheme," and discusses the potential next steps, including en banc review or a Supreme Court appeal. The discussion highlights the ongoing impact of the Bruen decision on Second Amendment law and what this legal victory means for gun rights in California.
This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that California's ammunition background check laws (Prop 63) are unconstitutional in the Rhode v. Bonta case. CRPA Legal Counsel Sean Brady and Olympic shooter Kim Rhode discuss the legal implications of this victory for the Second Amendment and California gun owners, the background of the lawsuit, the specific legal arguments used, and the potential future of gun laws in California. The discussion also touches upon the impact of the ruling on shooting sports culture and the broader implications for constitutional rights.
This video discusses California's recent 400% increase in ammunition background check fees, from $1 to $5, effective July 1st. It features a discussion with 2A attorney Matt Caballero, analyzing the implications of this fee hike and the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Nguyen v. Bonta, which struck down California's "one-gun-a-month" law. The video also touches on new legislative efforts to replace the struck-down law with a three-guns-a-month limit, exploring the impact on gun owners' rights and providing legal breakdowns and future outlooks. It references previous legislation like Prop 63 and ongoing court cases such as Rhode v. Bonta.
This video provides an update on the "Duncan v. Bonta" lawsuit concerning standard-capacity magazines in California. The CRPA legal team has secured an extension to file a Supreme Court petition, aiming to incorporate recent Supreme Court decisions and dissents, particularly those from Justices Kavanaugh and Alito that highlight lower courts' avoidance of the Bruen standard. The case is presented as a strong candidate for the Supreme Court to clarify Second Amendment jurisprudence nationwide due to its comprehensive trial record and decade-long history. The video encourages viewers to support CRPA's legal efforts.
This video provides a crucial update on the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit, a legal challenge against California's Proposition 63 magazine ban. Featuring legal expert Chuck Michel, the content breaks down the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion, discusses the implications of a 90-day stay, and explores the potential for the case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS). The video emphasizes how the ruling impacts gun owners' rights and urges viewers to support the legal fight to take it to SCOTUS.
This video provides a crucial update on the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit concerning California's Proposition 63 magazine ban. It explains the Ninth Circuit's official mandate, the reasons behind a 90-day partial stay, and what this means for Californians who own standard-capacity magazines. The content highlights CRPA's long-standing litigation efforts to block this law since 2017 and outlines the next steps, including the potential for the case to reach the Supreme Court. It emphasizes that current ownership of lawfully acquired standard-capacity magazines remains legally protected during this window.
This video discusses a new California gun law, SB1038, which amends Prop 63. The law drastically reduces the reporting time for lost or stolen firearms from five days to 48 hours and imposes severe financial penalties that the creator claims could bankrupt individuals. The video also includes a promotional segment for American Hartford Gold.
This video discusses upcoming gun control laws in California taking effect in 2024. The creator highlights that new, potentially unconstitutional laws are enacted frequently, with some becoming effective immediately, in January, or in July. The video encourages viewers to be prepared for these changes. It also includes promotions for a privacy service (DeleteMe) and the creator's merchandise, along with standard disclaimers about not being a lawyer and the content being for educational/entertainment purposes only.
This video discusses a significant legal victory for gun owners in California. The case, Rhode v. Bonta, saw Judge Roger Benitez overturn provisions of Proposition 63, including background checks for ammunition. The description highlights this as 'Freedom Week' version 2 and a huge win, with the judge issuing a permanent injunction against the challenged parts of the law. The content creator emphasizes that this is their opinion and not legal advice, and includes standard disclaimers about content for educational and entertainment purposes only and not to be imitated without professional guidance.
This video discusses how California's Proposition 63 and its associated background check fees, along with issues with the CFARS system, are inadvertently leading individuals to find workarounds, effectively undermining the law's intent. The creator is sharing their opinions and encourages viewers to seek legal advice from qualified professionals, not from the video itself. The video also includes promotional links for USCCA, gold, and merchandise.
This YouTube video discusses the legal challenge Rhode v. Bonta, which questions California's ammunition regulations under Prop 63. The content centers around a hearing held on July 17, 2023, presided over by Judge Roger Benitez. The creator expresses an expectation that Judge Benitez will rule in favor of the plaintiffs, based on comments made during the proceedings. The description also includes affiliate links for USCCA and gold purchases, alongside social media and merchandise promotion.
