This video discusses the US Supreme Court case *US v. Harris*, which challenges federal law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3), prohibiting marijuana users from owning firearms. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the case, its distinction from *US v. Hemani*, and its potential impact on how the government defines "prohibited persons." The discussion touches upon the historical context of gun ownership, legal buyers, the 4473 form, and broader Second Amendment litigation, including *Duncan v. Bonta*. The video also highlights CRPA's advocacy for both law enforcement and cannabis user rights, and the Supreme Court's process for reviewing cases.
This video discusses the legal challenge to California's ban on firearm magazines holding more than ten rounds in the landmark Duncan v. Bonta case. CRPA President Chuck Michel and Kevin Small break down California's opposition brief, exploring arguments related to the 'takings clause,' the definition of 'arms' under the Second Amendment, and historical parallels. The discussion highlights how this case could be the most significant Second Amendment legal battle since the Bruen decision and anticipates its potential path to the U.S. Supreme Court, with implications for gun owners nationwide. It also touches on the influence of gun control advocacy groups and recent DOJ reversals.
This video analyzes California's AB 1078, a new law described as a sweeping anti-Second Amendment bill. It bundles significant restrictions including CCW limitations for applicants and renewals, prohibitions for those with restraining orders, and a "three-guns-a-month" purchase limit. The discussion covers due-process concerns, potential abuse of discretion by local agencies, psych evaluations, and how this law conflicts with Supreme Court rulings like Bruen and Rahimi. CRPA President Chuck Michel and Kevin Small break down the implications, discuss precedent set by Nguyen v. Bonta, and outline CRPA's preparation for inevitable legal challenges.
This video discusses a landmark lawsuit filed by Pam Bondi's DOJ against the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department concerning Second Amendment violations related to concealed carry permit (CCW) delays. Chuck Michel, CRPA President, explains the unprecedented nature of the DOJ's affirmative action on behalf of gun owners, the issues of excessive wait times and bureaucratic hurdles, and the potential impact on CCW reform statewide. The video also touches on the CRPA's "CCW Reckoning Project" and how viewers can support such legal efforts.
This video features Attorney Chuck Michel discussing important news related to the Second Amendment. The content is presented by GunGuyTV and aims to keep viewers informed about current events impacting firearm rights. The description also includes links to subscribe to various channels and support GunGuyTV, covering firearms training, general content, and even a Christian channel.
This video discusses the legal battle surrounding California's ammunition background check law (Prop 63) following a defeat for the state in the Rhode v. Bonta case. California has filed for an en banc review at the Ninth Circuit, aiming to overturn a recent victory for Second Amendment advocates. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the state's legal strategy, the Ninth Circuit's political landscape, and the potential national impact on gun owners and Second Amendment litigation. The discussion also touches on historical legal arguments, state tactics to delay constitutional rulings, the potential role of the Supreme Court, and ways for supporters to aid the CRPA in their legal efforts.
This video from CRPA discusses their ongoing legal battle to restore Second Amendment rights for Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) applications in California. It highlights recent victories against LA County, the City of La Verne, and the DOJ, and outlines upcoming legal actions against Santa Clara and the LAPD concerning unconstitutional delays and excessive fees. The "CCW Reckoning Campaign" aims to dismantle anti-gun policies, challenge Bloomberg-funded law firms, and reform California's permit system, with a focus on establishing legal precedent and potentially utilizing third-party vendors to expedite the process. The video encourages viewers to support CRPA's advocacy efforts.
This video breaks down the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Rhode v. Bonta, which declared California's ammunition background check system unconstitutional. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains how Proposition 63 became a rights-restricting law, why the court labeled it a "background check scheme," and discusses the potential next steps, including en banc review or a Supreme Court appeal. The discussion highlights the ongoing impact of the Bruen decision on Second Amendment law and what this legal victory means for gun rights in California.
This video discusses a significant legal victory for the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) in federal court against the LA County Sheriff's Department regarding concealed carry permits (CCW). The court ruled in favor of CRPA, affirming their standing to sue and rejecting LA County's attempts to delay or deny permits. The discussion covers the implications for CCW holders in California, out-of-state applicants, and future legal challenges against other anti-CCW jurisdictions like LAPD and Santa Clara County. The video also highlights the CCW Reckoning Project and provides ways for viewers to support CRPA's advocacy.
This YouTube video features CRPA President Chuck Michel discussing the increasing national attention on suppressor deregulation and its implications for Californians. The episode unpacks the Hearing Protection Act, the Gun Owners of America's lawsuit, and CRPA's legal challenge to California's suppressor ban in Sanchez v. Bonta. It questions the constitutionality of the NFA in light of the Bruen decision and the potential Supreme Court review of the Duncan case, connecting advocacy, legal strategies, and the future of suppressor rights.
This video provides a detailed breakdown of the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss Mexico's lawsuit against U.S. gun manufacturers, a significant victory for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) and gun owners. Host Chuck Michel explains the implications of this ruling, including a notable mention of AR-15s being in common use. The video also covers the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in cases concerning magazine bans (Ocean State Tactical) and semi-automatic bans (Snoke), discussing what this means for the future of Second Amendment rights and upcoming legal challenges. It highlights ongoing anti-2A legislation and encourages support for advocacy groups like CRPA.
This video discusses the rapidly evolving legal landscape surrounding suppressors (silencers) in the United States, with a particular focus on California. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down recent legal developments, including the DOJ's admission in the Peterson case that suppressors are constitutionally protected arms, and the CRPA's involvement in the Sanchez lawsuit challenging California's ban. The content also covers the potential impact of the Bruen decision and federal legislation like the Hearing Protection Act. It aims to inform viewers about these changes and encourage support for the ongoing legal fight.
