This video from CRPA analyzes the Duncan v. Bonta legal decision in California, focusing on how the state is redefining the term 'dangerous' in relation to firearms. It argues that this redefinition conflicts with Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights. The discussion highlights how the state is attempting to disregard the protection of commonly possessed arms and arms used for protected activities like marksmanship.
This video provides a comprehensive recap of the 2025 legislative year in California concerning firearm laws. It details significant anti-Second Amendment proposals, unexpected pro-2A developments, and the impact of grassroots advocacy, Capitol Days, and direct engagement with lawmakers. CRPA's Legislative Director, Rick Travis, breaks down how specific bills gained national controversy and highlights the importance of understanding legislative processes for future advocacy efforts. The session's key victories and defeats are analyzed, offering insights for Californians preparing for the 2026 session.
This video breaks down the key legal arguments in Sanchez v. Bonta, a Ninth Circuit case challenging California's ban on firearm suppressors. It discusses CRPA's involvement, the court's request for expert counsel, and the oral arguments, focusing on the state's 'not an arm' defense and the potential impact on Second Amendment rights post-Bruen. The analysis explores whether suppressors are protected under the Second Amendment and forecasts potential outcomes for 2026. It also touches on the broader landscape of Second Amendment litigation and shifts under the Trump DOJ.
This video analyzes the critical juncture of the Duncan v. Bonta case as it reaches the U.S. Supreme Court's conference. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the significance of the conference, the factors Justices consider, and how Duncan compares to other Second Amendment petitions like Wolford and the marijuana-possession case. The discussion highlights the unprecedented activity on the Supreme Court's firearms docket in modern history and explores the need for clearer guidance following the Bruen decision, potential outcomes for Duncan, and judicial resistance in lower courts. It also encourages viewers to support CRPA.
This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision in Roe v. Bonta, a California ammunition background check case. It discusses the court's vote for en banc rehearing, which vacated a previous pro-Second Amendment ruling. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the implications of this decision, the state's motivations, and how the Bruen framework applies. The video also touches on the Ninth Circuit's history of alleged bias, the broader national impact on ammunition laws, and upcoming related cases like Duncan v. Bonta, highlighting the stakes for California gun owners and the potential reshaping of Second Amendment law on the West Coast.
This video critiques California's comprehensive gun control laws following a mass shooting at a children's birthday party. The presenter argues that despite having numerous regulations like red flag laws, magazine bans, and assault weapon bans, such violence still occurs. The video analyzes the event, including gang involvement and news footage, to demonstrate why the state's approach, which the author believes disarms law-abiding citizens while failing to deter criminals, is ineffective. It advocates for an alternative perspective on gun control's failure, suggesting it's not a matter of strength but of fundamental ineffectiveness. The description also promotes a Cyber Monday sale on merchandise related to Second Amendment rights and tactical gear.
This video breaks down recent changes to California's CCW instructor regulations under SB 2 and proposed new rules for gun shows. It's a must-watch for CCW instructors, applicants, gun show producers, and vendors in California, detailing what's changing, what isn't, and CRPA's role. The discussion covers the rulemaking process, the impact of these regulations, and public comment opportunities. Sponsors like CCW Safe and The Police Credit Union are mentioned.
This video discusses the legal implications of California's AB 2571, often referred to as the "youth marketing" ban, being fully enjoined by the Ninth Circuit. Attorney Anna Barvir explains the court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction against its enforcement in the "Junior Sports Magazine v. Bonta" case. The discussion covers the reasons behind the injunction, the concept of "dead law walking," and potential future legal developments including a permanent injunction, settlement, the gun show cases, CCW Reckoning, and the "Duncan" case at SCOTUS. The video also highlights the impact on youth programs, ranges, magazines, and sponsors, and includes a call to action for viewers to become CRPA members.
This YouTube video discusses the legality of Glock Gen 5 pistols in California, concluding that despite political pressure, Glock made only minor changes to address liability concerning Glock switches, while seemingly disregarding California's specific regulations for general sale. The creator suggests the changes are not functional and the core platform remains the same, allowing for broader market availability outside of strict jurisdictions.
This video analyzes whether Glock's new V Series firearms meet the criteria for the California Roster, specifically referencing AB1127. The discussion centers on whether the V Series has undergone sufficient or too many modifications to be reintroduced to the California market. The description also includes promotional material for American Hartford Gold and the creator's social media and merchandise.
This video discusses how restraining orders in California can be misused to disarm innocent gun owners. It highlights real-life cases where minor disputes, like one over security cameras, have led to significant firearm bans. The content emphasizes the importance of due process and argues that the current system punishes law-abiding citizens rather than protecting victims, advocating for fairness in California's gun laws.
This video discusses the US Supreme Court case *US v. Harris*, which challenges federal law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3), prohibiting marijuana users from owning firearms. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down the case, its distinction from *US v. Hemani*, and its potential impact on how the government defines "prohibited persons." The discussion touches upon the historical context of gun ownership, legal buyers, the 4473 form, and broader Second Amendment litigation, including *Duncan v. Bonta*. The video also highlights CRPA's advocacy for both law enforcement and cannabis user rights, and the Supreme Court's process for reviewing cases.
