This video analyzes the legal strategy California is employing in the Duncan v. Bonta case to justify its large-capacity magazine ban. The state is reportedly relying on an academic theory called "corpus linguistics," which the video suggests may backfire due to a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, an expert on the Second Amendment and author, breaks down the "geeky details" of corpus linguistics and its implications for gun rights. The video emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty and provides information for Second Amendment advocates.
This video explains 'corpus linguistics,' a method of analyzing text databases to understand word usage. Anti-gun advocates are using this technique to argue that the Second Amendment's 'bear arms' phrase historically referred only to militia service, thereby excluding individual self-defense rights. The video refutes this, highlighting that the Supreme Court rejected similar arguments in the Heller decision and that corpus linguistics is a flawed and unreliable method for interpreting constitutional rights. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these legal arguments to defend gun rights.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
