This video analyzes the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's oral arguments in the Miller v. Bonta case, which challenges California's ban on "assault weapons" (semi-automatic rifles). Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, breaks down the arguments, focusing on judicial questions regarding "dangerous features" and "common use." The discussion also touches upon potential errors in California's law and quotes relevant legal precedents. The content is presented by the "Four Boxes Diner," which focuses on Second Amendment news and analysis.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
