This video's title suggests a discussion about YouTube's platform policies regarding firearms content, implying potential censorship or demonetization issues faced by the creator. The creator, TYMPPP, is apologizing for 'unacceptable behavior,' which, in the context of the title, likely refers to content that has been flagged or restricted. The description includes links to merchandise, a backup channel, and support platforms like Patreon and SubscribeStar, indicating the creator relies on these for income and audience engagement. The core theme revolves around the challenges of creating and distributing firearm-related content on YouTube.
The YouTube video titled "Youtube hates this short" suggests content that may be controversial, potentially critical of YouTube's policies or algorithms, or perhaps features content that YouTube often flags or demonetizes. Without a description, it's difficult to ascertain the specific subject matter. However, the title implies a focus on content creation challenges on the platform, potentially related to sensitive topics or formats that are under scrutiny. The brevity indicated by "short" suggests it's a concise piece of content.
This video discusses how YouTube firearms channels can face demonetization and deletion due to evolving and increasingly restrictive platform policies. It delves into the pitfalls creators encounter regarding automated systems, ad revenue, ad-friendly guidelines, and community guidelines. The content creator also shares a Discord link and lists some of the equipment they use, including various firearm targets, a chronograph, and snap caps for different calibers.
This video is a spoof discussing YouTube's increasingly strict policies regarding firearm content. The creator humorously questions what constitutes an "acceptable" gun video, even referencing toy guns as a potential workaround to avoid demonetization or removal. The core of the video appears to be a discussion or commentary on the challenges of creating firearm-related content within platform guidelines, rather than a demonstration of specific firearms.
The video creator expresses frustration over a significant portion of their content being demonetized, questioning the level of disrespect involved. While the specific subject matter of the demonetized videos isn't detailed, the title implies a connection to content that YouTube's policies may deem inappropriate or controversial, potentially related to firearms or other sensitive topics.
This video's title indicates a potential issue with YouTube's monetization policies for firearm-related content creators. The creator is likely discussing their experience with demonetization and its impact on their channel. Given the title, the content might revolve around the challenges of producing and monetizing content that falls within YouTube's community guidelines, possibly touching upon censorship or algorithmic biases against certain topics. The video might offer insights or complaints from the creator's perspective on why their content was demonetized.
This YouTube Short's title, "YouTube won’t MONITIZED this short WHY????😜😜", suggests a video about a YouTube creator's struggle with monetization, possibly related to content that violates YouTube's policies. Without a description or transcript, the specific reason for demonetization is unknown. However, the emojis suggest it might be a lighthearted or humorous take on the issue. The content's relevance to firearms is uncertain based solely on the provided information.
This video, titled 'LARP Patrol,' features content from InRange TV, a channel that acknowledges proactive demonetization. The description hints at the video going to places other content creators may avoid, suggesting an adventurous or perhaps controversial exploration within the firearms community. The focus seems to be on a 'LARP Patrol,' which could imply tactical training, scenario-based exercises, or exploring specific locations with a firearms theme. The mention of Patreon indicates a reliance on community support for content creation.
This is a re-upload of a 2016 video detailing a potential TV show collaboration with a major cable network. The production company filmed for three days, capturing the creators' experiences. Although the show ultimately didn't materialize, the creators express confidence in their authenticity and potential appeal. The description hints at a past "demonitization scandal" in 2020, prompting the re-upload.
This video discusses how Zorka.Mobi is allegedly using advertising and monetization practices as a weapon against content creators, a topic InRange TV has been vocal about. The description emphasizes that InRange TV is entirely viewer-supported via Patreon, implying that external pressures on advertising revenue could impact independent content production.
This YouTube video from MrGunsnGear discusses ongoing issues with demonetization and deplatforming within the 2A community. The content focuses on the challenges faced by creators and advocates of Second Amendment rights on online platforms. While no specific firearms are demonstrated or reviewed, the core topic revolves around the political and societal pressures impacting gun-related content creators. The description also includes various links for support and alternative platforms.
This InRangeTV video discusses the parallels between YouTube's demonetization practices and the methods used by Communist China to exert control. The creators draw a connection between the 'Adpocalypse' on YouTube and corporate responses to Chinese influence, suggesting that demonetization, while not outright censorship, serves as a form of control. The video also briefly mentions other related InRangeTV content and highlights Patreon as the sole support for the channel.
