This video discusses a significant legal development regarding Second Amendment rights in New Jersey. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals will conduct an en banc review of the state's "assault weapon" and magazine bans. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, analyzes the implications of this decision for gun owners. The description highlights Smith's expertise, including his scholarship being used in legal arguments and his past commentary quoted by federal judges. The content aims to provide information and analysis for defending constitutional liberties, referencing the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video discusses the legal challenge to New Jersey's assault weapon ban in the case of Cheeseman v. Platkin. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law explains that the case has been ordered for en banc review by the Chief Judge of the 3rd Circuit, meaning all active judges will hear the case. This development presents a significant opportunity to challenge assault weapon bans nationwide, not just within New Jersey. The video aims to educate viewers on the legal implications and the potential impact on Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a significant Second Amendment legal development, focusing on Minnesota's attempt to avoid a US Supreme Court ruling in the Worth v. Jacobson case. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes the state's strategy of filing for en banc review by the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The case centers on the rights of 18-20 year olds to carry handguns in public for self-defense. The discussion touches upon the broader implications for gun rights and contrasts with the recent Rahimi case.
This video discusses a significant legal development impacting the Second Amendment. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has denied a rehearing en banc in the Oakland Tactical Supply, LLC v. Howell Township, MI case. This decision potentially escalates the legal battle to the Supreme Court, focusing on the Second Amendment right to train. Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and frequent Fox News guest, provides analysis on this critical issue.
This video analyzes a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that reversed a Second Amendment victory, specifically reinstating Hawaii's ban on butterfly knives in the case of Teter v. Lopez. The analysis is provided by constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner, who discusses the implications of the court granting an en banc review. The content highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding Second Amendment rights and references Smith's previous work, including arguments used before the U.S. Supreme Court and a federal judge's ruling on an "assault weapon" ban.
This video discusses the ongoing legal battle concerning presidential immunity, focusing on a Supreme Court case involving Donald Trump. Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and frequent Fox News guest, analyzes the status of the case, including the appeals process, en banc review, and the actions of a three-judge panel. The discussion touches upon the potential for a double standard and the broader constitutional issues and timing challenges within the legal fight. The content is presented through the lens of "The Four Boxes Diner," a platform dedicated to Second Amendment news and analysis.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the legal challenges surrounding firearm ownership in the United States. Specifically, he analyzes the "Bianchi v. Brown" case, a challenge to Maryland's assault weapon ban, and its journey through the court system, including a GVR from the Supreme Court and subsequent en banc review by the 4th Circuit. The video aims to highlight the lengthy and complex legal processes involved in Second Amendment rights cases, prompting the question of whether the court system itself is contributing to the disarming of citizens. It encourages viewers to educate themselves on these matters and provides contact information for legal assistance.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the recent and unusual developments in the Duncan v. Bonta case concerning magazine bans. The 9th Circuit's decision to bypass a three-judge panel and move directly to an en banc review is highlighted as unprecedented and potentially indicative of negative outcomes for gun rights. The discussion also touches on judges publicly criticizing their colleagues' procedural decisions. The video aims to educate viewers on these legal developments and their implications for Second Amendment rights.
This video analyzes a significant Second Amendment case decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The court denied an en banc review of a case involving a criminal defendant charged under 18 USC 922(g)(1), the law prohibiting felons from possessing firearms. However, four dissenting judges strongly questioned the constitutionality of this law, suggesting it could become a major Supreme Court case. The analysis delves into the legal arguments, historical parallels, and potential implications for Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a major Second Amendment victory where the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a panel decision that upheld a Florida law banning firearm purchases for 18-20 year olds. The analysis suggests the panel's initial decision was flawed. The content creator, Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, also touches upon a 'Compelled Carry Law' and the potential for future Supreme Court involvement. The video emphasizes understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box, to defend constitutional rights.
This video features Rick Travis from the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) providing an update on the Duncan vs. Becerra case concerning California's magazine restrictions. The discussion centers on the case's current status with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and the California attorney general's request for an en banc review. The video also includes links for joining CRPA, shopping at Brownells, visiting the host's website, and checking out training at Practical Defense Systems, as well as support options like Patreon and donations.
This video explains the legal implications of California's magazine ban, specifically focusing on the Duncan v. Becerra case and the recent en banc review request by Attorney General Becerra in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Rick Travis from CRPA provides an explanation of the current situation and what it means for firearm owners. The video also references landmark Supreme Court cases like D.C. v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, and provides links to the host's website, training resources, and various social media platforms.
