This video discusses a significant legal development regarding firearm carry laws in Philadelphia. An appeals court has ruled that a law restricting open carry in the city violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, analyzes this ruling. The discussion also touches upon broader Second Amendment issues and related articles and resources.
This video discusses a recent legal challenge to a gun law in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The law, which required permits for open carry specifically within the city, was successfully challenged not on Second Amendment grounds, but through an Equal Protection argument. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains the legal strategy behind this 'brilliant legal chess move' and encourages viewers to stay informed about their rights. The video links to the full ruling in Pennsylvania v. Sumpter and provides resources for subscribing to newsletters and contacting Washington Gun Law for further information.
This video aims to educate viewers on the significance of the 14th Amendment, highlighting its guarantees of citizenship and fundamental rights such as life, liberty, property, and equal protection under the law. The description also includes numerous promotional links for firearms-related gear, training courses, and merchandise from Paramount Tactical, suggesting a strong connection to the shooting sports and tactical community. The content itself, based on the description, focuses on civic education with an underlying promotion of tactical products and a lifestyle brand.
This video from CRPA discusses whether California is attempting to push FFLs (Federal Firearm Licensees) out of business. It references legal proceedings and the concept of equal protection, and touches on the implications for existing camera systems in stores. The video aims to inform viewers about the potential impact of current legislation on firearm businesses in California and encourages viewers to join CRPA for more information and resources.
This video discusses the Illinois Supreme Court's decision to uphold the state's "assault weapon" ban. The court ruled that the ban does not violate the Illinois state constitution. The analysis touches on the upcoming state justice election and includes a dissent from Justice O'Brian. The content also criticizes what it calls "gun violence" propaganda and emphasizes the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box, for defending individual freedoms.
This video discusses a significant legal development where an Illinois State Court Judge Webb ruled the state's 'assault weapon' and magazine ban unconstitutional. The judge applied strict scrutiny, finding the law violated equal protection clauses and infringed upon the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner analyzes the ruling, emphasizing its importance for gun rights in Illinois and potentially beyond. The discussion touches on the state constitution and governmental failures in enacting what is perceived as discriminatory legislation. The content highlights the role of legal analysis and constitutional interpretation in defending Second Amendment liberties.
You've reached the end! 6 videos loaded.
