This video discusses a significant legal development in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals concerning federal gun laws. The court has taken over a case challenging 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(1), the federal prohibition on felons possessing firearms. This follows a similar move in a case challenging the New Jersey assault weapon ban. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, suggests the 3rd Circuit is becoming a central battleground for Second Amendment litigation.
This video discusses a new plan by the DOJ concerning a federal gun law challenged by the Firearms Policy Coalition's lawsuit, Elite Precision Customs v. ATF. The law in question is the Interstate Handgun Purchase Ban from 1968. The DOJ, admitting the law is unconstitutional under the Bruen standard, is reportedly seeking to limit the ruling's scope to a specific case in Texas rather than a broad strike-down. The creator expresses concern that this tactic could establish a precedent where constitutional rights, including Second Amendment rights, are only protected for individuals who litigate, rather than applying universally to all Americans.
This video discusses a significant legal challenge brought forth by FPC (Firearms Policy Coalition) against 18 USC Section 922(b)(3), a federal law that prohibits out-of-state handgun purchases from dealers. The lawsuit, Elite Precision v. ATF, argues that this restriction lacks historical legal precedent. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides an analysis of the case, questioning if FPC has taken on an overly ambitious endeavor. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the matter and highlights resources for supporting the Second Amendment, including FPC, Protect With Bear, and Washington Gun Law's newsletter and contact information.
This video discusses the ongoing legal challenge to the federal law prohibiting individuals who use controlled substances from possessing firearms. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, details the case of United States v. Daniels, which has seen lower-level successes for the challengers but is now being petitioned for review by the Supreme Court by the DOJ. The video highlights a 'real twist' that could significantly alter the case's outcome, urging viewers to arm themselves with education on this critical Second Amendment issue.
This video discusses recent decisions by the DOJ to not pursue appeals in key firearm-related legal cases, specifically "Range v. AGUSA" and "United States v. Baxter." William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explains the potential significant impact these decisions could have on lawful cannabis users' ability to own firearms nationwide. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these developments to understand their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a significant legal setback for federal gun laws, specifically focusing on the prohibition preventing cannabis consumers from exercising their Second Amendment rights. It revisits the United States v. Daniels case, where the 5th Circuit, following a Supreme Court remand, once again ruled the law unconstitutional as applied to Daniels. The content aims to educate viewers on the implications of this ruling for firearm ownership, particularly for individuals who use cannabis for any reason, including medical purposes.
This video discusses a significant ruling from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. Paola Connelly. The ruling found federal laws prohibiting firearm possession by cannabis users unconstitutional as applied to the defendant. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, explains the implications of this decision and its potential future impact on federal gun laws and the Second Amendment rights of individuals who use substances that are legal in many states.
This video discusses a significant legal victory for Second Amendment rights, as the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit declared federal gun law 18 USC 922g3 unconstitutional. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, from Four Boxes Diner, analyzes the ruling, explaining its implications for gun owners and constitutional liberties. The content emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box, aiming to provide viewers with vital information for defending their rights.
This video discusses a legal challenge potentially overturning an "unconstitutional federal gun law" and links to various organizations supporting Second Amendment rights. It also promotes Lear Capital for gold and silver investments, email list sign-ups, merchandise, and a backup YouTube channel. The description includes detailed disclaimers about the content's educational and entertainment purpose, emphasizing safe practices and legal product availability.
This YouTube video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzing and predicting the US Supreme Court's decisions on Second Amendment cases, specifically highlighting the upcoming US v. Rahimi case and its implications for "prohibited persons" regulations under federal gun control law (18 USC 922g). Smith, a Supreme Court Bar member and frequent Fox News guest, delves into how these rulings might affect gun ownership rights, discussing categories of "convicted felons," drug offenders, and the controversial "red flag" laws. The content aims to inform gun owners about their constitutional rights and potential legal challenges.
This video discusses the 9th Circuit's 2-1 decision in US v. Duarte, which challenged federal law 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(1) prohibiting felons from possessing firearms. The ruling, if it stands before a full panel, could create a significant circuit split and potentially lead to Supreme Court review. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk explains the implications for individuals, particularly older, non-violent felons, and encourages viewers to educate themselves on their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a federal court ruling that struck down 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(5), a law prohibiting firearm possession by undocumented aliens. The ruling was made by an Obama-appointed judge, and the host, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the case United States v. Carbajal-Flores. The video questions whether this ruling, which advances Second Amendment rights, is ultimately beneficial, urging viewers to educate themselves on the matter.
