This video discusses the arrest of a British IT consultant in Florida for legally possessing and photographing a shotgun. The incident highlights concerns about overreach in gun laws and its potential impact on gun owners and free speech advocates in the US. The content breaks down the legal aspects of the situation and its implications for the Second Amendment.
This video analyzes the legal contradiction in California where firearms can be legal to possess but banned to sell, focusing on the James v. Bonta case. It argues that the Second Amendment protects both the ability to own and purchase firearms, as these are integral to exercising one's rights. The discussion highlights the importance of legal precedent in gun ownership and challenges arbitrary bans on sales.
This video discusses a new Supreme Court case, United States v. Hemani, which challenges Federal law 18 USC Section 922(g)(3). This law prohibits individuals who use illegal controlled substances from possessing firearms. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes the case and its potential implications, questioning whether the Supreme Court's acceptance of this case is a positive development for gun rights. The video aims to educate viewers on this legal development affecting Second Amendment rights.
This video aims to clarify the complex relationship between mental health, legal firearm ownership, and the process of purchasing or possessing firearms. It intends to explain the actual definitions and procedures involved, addressing common confusion surrounding these topics. The description highlights that InRange TV is viewer-supported through Patreon.
This video discusses a significant legal decision where a Supreme Court ruling was used to overturn a machine gun possession law. The content delves into how this legal precedent impacts gun laws and includes the Department of Justice's response. The creator also promotes their AOR service and a free Legal Survival Guide, with affiliate links for their YouTube setup and the AOR promotion. A legal disclaimer is provided, emphasizing that the content is not legal advice.
This video discusses a significant ruling from the 10th Circuit in the case of United States v. Harrison, which challenges federal prohibitions on marijuana users possessing firearms. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains how a 3-judge panel has sent the case back to the District Court with a ruling he deems "incredibly dangerous." The ruling, if upheld, could lead to arbitrary disarmament based on political decisions. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on this critical issue affecting Second Amendment rights and provides links to the court's ruling and resources from Washington Gun Law.
This video discusses a new proposed rule from the Justice Department that could allow certain individuals previously prohibited from possessing firearms to have them returned. The title highlights the controversial nature of "criminals getting their guns back." The description provides a link to the official Justice Department press release and the full text of the proposed rule. It also promotes the VSO Gun Channel as an educational resource focusing on responsible gun ownership and safety, while clarifying that VSO is not involved in selling firearms.
This video, titled "I GOT PULLED OVER WITH GUNS!!", appears to document a situation where the creator was stopped by law enforcement while in possession of firearms. The description includes a merch link and disclaimers that the video is not promoting gun sales and was performed in a safe environment by trained professionals. The hashtags suggest a focus on legal carry and personal safety.
This video discusses a legal case where three individuals under 21 had their firearm possession charges dismissed based on Second Amendment rights. However, the state has subsequently recharged them for failing to apply for a permit that they are legally ineligible to obtain due to their age. The description also includes various links for viewer support, merchandise, and affiliate partnerships.
This video analyzes a significant legal decision where the Supreme Court's rulings were used to overturn machine gun possession charges. The content focuses on the legal implications of this decision and includes the Department of Justice's response. The video aims to inform viewers about the impact of this ruling on firearm laws and possession cases, particularly concerning machine guns.
This video discusses the confusion and legal uncertainty surrounding California's Assembly Bill 574, which requires firearm buyers to confirm possession of all previously owned firearms. The California Department of Justice (DOJ) has failed to provide clear guidance, leaving Firearm Licensed Dealers (FFLs) and gun owners in a state of legal limbo. The CRPA and legal experts are working to address the DOJ's inaction and protect the rights of the state's gun community. The video highlights potential legal issues for buyers and FFLs, and questions whether this could lead to a backdoor gun registry, with a call for continued engagement and protection of gun rights.
This video discusses the recent Illinois v. Brown case where a court ruled the FOID Act unconstitutional as it pertains to possessing firearms in the home, citing a lack of historical support. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explains the significance of this ruling, noting its potential national implications. While the state is likely to appeal, the case is presented as a major victory for Second Amendment rights. The video encourages viewers to read the court's order and offers resources for further information and engagement.
