Videos tagged with Firearm Prohibition

This video discusses two significant legal victories for Second Amendment rights. First, it covers the striking down of New York's concealed carry law that restricted permits to in-state residents, in the case of Higbie v. James. Second, it details the 11th Circuit's ruling that the federal ban on medical marijuana patients possessing firearms is unconstitutional. The video also briefly mentions a prior win in New Mexico regarding statutory waiting periods, highlighting growing legal momentum for gun rights.

This video title, '🤫 Por que essa proibição não faz sentido... (Veja o comentário fixado para experimentar Aura)', strongly suggests a discussion related to firearm regulations and bans. The use of the "shushing" emoji and the phrase "essa proibição não faz sentido" implies a critical examination of a specific firearm prohibition. The mention of 'experimentar Aura' in the pinned comment hints at a potential call to action or demonstration related to the topic, possibly involving a product or service called 'Aura'. Given the context, the video is likely to delve into the reasoning behind why a particular firearm ban is considered illogical by the content creator, potentially referencing legal, practical, or constitutional arguments.

This video discusses the ongoing legal challenge to the federal law prohibiting individuals who use controlled substances from possessing firearms. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, details the case of United States v. Daniels, which has seen lower-level successes for the challengers but is now being petitioned for review by the Supreme Court by the DOJ. The video highlights a 'real twist' that could significantly alter the case's outcome, urging viewers to arm themselves with education on this critical Second Amendment issue.

This video discusses a significant legal setback for federal gun laws, specifically focusing on the prohibition preventing cannabis consumers from exercising their Second Amendment rights. It revisits the United States v. Daniels case, where the 5th Circuit, following a Supreme Court remand, once again ruled the law unconstitutional as applied to Daniels. The content aims to educate viewers on the implications of this ruling for firearm ownership, particularly for individuals who use cannabis for any reason, including medical purposes.

This video discusses California Senate Bill 53 (SB53), an active piece of legislation that has undergone amendments. Originally focused on taxes and the film industry, the bill has been revised to address firearm storage. A key aspect of the amendment includes a penalty that would enforce a one-year prohibition on firearm ownership. The video highlights the progression of this bill through the legislative process.

This video discusses a significant legal development: a judge has ruled that federal prohibitions on Second Amendment rights for marijuana users are unconstitutional. The content appears to be informational, focusing on legal challenges to firearm ownership restrictions related to marijuana use. It promotes various related organizations and resources, including an email list, Patreon, and firearm-related advocacy groups like Gun Owners of America and Firearms Policy Coalition.

This YouTube video discusses a significant Second Amendment court case where the Second Amendment Law Center and California Rifle & Pistol Association are supporting a lawsuit challenging firearm prohibition related to restraining orders. The title suggests a dramatic and potentially confrontational aspect to the case, hinting at public reaction or specific incidents. The description links to legal documents and organizational websites involved in the case. The video also includes unrelated promotions for supplements, gold purchases, and body armor.

This video features Washington Gun Law President William Kirk discussing private businesses' rights in Washington state to prohibit firearms on their premises. He clarifies that private businesses cannot enact laws like 'Gun Free Zones' but can set terms for conducting business. Consumers have the right to choose whether to patronize such businesses. The video also references specific Revised Code of Washington (RCW) statutes related to firearms and provides links to external resources about business gun policies.