This video analyzes the legal arguments surrounding "sensitive places" in Second Amendment law, specifically focusing on the distinction between "lands" and "buildings" in historical contexts. Constitutional attorney Mark Smith discusses how anti-gun states like New Jersey and New York are misinterpreting 18th-century laws concerning hunting and anti-poaching to justify bans on carrying handguns on private property. The video highlights a legal brief arguing that the "sensitive place" default rule is unconstitutional and explores the evolution of the term "gun" and its implications for current gun rights debates.
This video discusses a significant legal victory for the Second Amendment, where a Federal Judge in Buffalo, NY, declared the state's ban on guns in places of worship unconstitutional. The judge cited a lack of historical precedent from the Founding era to justify such bans. The analysis highlights the importance of historical context in Second Amendment jurisprudence, referencing the 1791 era and the Bruen decision. The ruling was not stayed, meaning it is effective immediately. The content also touches on evolving anti-gun arguments and thanks supporters.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
