Videos tagged with Gun Buy Back

This video discusses a tactic purportedly used by 'unusual gun grabbers' related to gun confiscation, specifically mentioning 'gun buy backs' as a spreading phenomenon in the US. The creator emphasizes that their content consists of personal opinions and observations on real-world scenarios, not legal advice.

This video critically analyzes a recent gun buy-back program conducted by Columbus Police. The presenter argues that the program was "incompetent" and a waste of taxpayer money (over $100K), as it intentionally excluded firearm types most likely to be involved in crime, such as 3D printed and homemade guns. The description highlights the program's failure to address the actual issue of crime guns while "fleeceing Americans of their lawfully acquired second amendment protected property."

This video delves into the question of whether the US government tracks firearm ownership. It aims to clarify the reality behind government gun records, gun registries, and the implications for the Second Amendment. The content also encourages viewer support through Patreon.

This YouTube video explores whether the US government tracks the types and quantities of firearms owned by citizens. It delves into concepts like gun tracing, tracking, and the existence of a national gun registry. The video aims to answer direct questions about government knowledge of individual gun ownership and its potential implications, while also promoting the creator's Patreon channel for support.

This video from Iraqveteran8888's 'Gun Gripes' series, episode #209, critically examines Beto O'Rourke's "Gun Buy Back" proposal. The content is presented for documentary, educational, and entertainment purposes, emphasizing that all shooting is done on approved ranges under professional supervision. The video promotes various merchandise and support channels for the creators, including a podcast, merchandise stores, and social media platforms. A disclaimer highlights that the content is not instructional, is for entertainment, and viewers assume all risk. The video also touches on fair use for commentary and freedom of speech.