Videos tagged with Imminent Threat

This video, featuring Washington Gun Law President William Kirk, analyzes the Daniel Penny case, focusing on self-defense principles and the defense of others. It delves into the legal ramifications of acting when feeling an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. The video frames the case as a significant learning opportunity for understanding self-defense rights and encourages viewers to arm themselves with education. It also promotes the Sonoran Desert Institute for firearms industry careers and Washington Gun Law's resources for staying informed on Second Amendment issues.

This video breaks down the critical questions surrounding when you can legally use deadly force in self-defense and the immediate aftermath. It defines 'imminent threat,' details what happens in the seconds and minutes following a shooting incident, and provides crucial advice on what to say (and not say) to 911 and responding police officers. The importance of USCCA membership for gun owners planning for self-defense is also highlighted, with links to related member success stories and cautionary tales.

This video, featuring Kevin Michalowski of the USCCA and attorney Tom Grieve, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force in the United States for self-defense. It specifically addresses viewer questions about whether the threshold for using deadly force changes during civil unrest or natural disasters, particularly when protecting essential supplies like food and water. The experts clarify that the core legal standard – reasonably fearing imminent death or great bodily harm – remains constant, although circumstances can influence a jury's perception of a threat. They strongly advise against engaging in riots and emphasize the importance of safe escape if possible, reiterating that self-defense laws do not adapt to societal upheaval.

This video, featuring Kevin Michalowski from the U.S. Concealed Carry Association and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve, addresses the critical question of when it is legally permissible to use deadly force in self-defense. The discussion centers on the concept of "stand your ground" and outlines that deadly force is only justifiable when facing an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm. The experts emphasize that any use of force must be objectively reasonable, considering factors like disparity in size, strength, and the availability of escape options. Deadly force is presented as an absolute last resort, never justified for lesser threats to oneself or property. The video also promotes the USCCA through links for a gun giveaway and membership.

This video analyzes a dashcam incident where fireworks were thrown into a convertible. Legal experts Kevin Michalowski (USCCA) and Tom Grieve (criminal defense attorney) discuss whether the victim could have legally used deadly force in response to this attack, even after the perpetrators fled. The discussion covers the definition of an imminent deadly threat, the legal implications of chasing a fleeing suspect, and the importance of situational awareness while driving. It highlights the challenges of defending oneself when the threat is immediate and the opportunity to act is limited.

This video, featuring Washington Gun Law President William Kirk, clarifies the legal parameters for using deadly force to defend property in Washington State. It emphasizes that under RCW 9A.16.010, deadly force is permissible only when facing an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. Consequently, using deadly force solely for property defense is not legally sanctioned in Washington. The discussion also touches upon how the legal justification for using force can evolve if the threat escalates beyond a threat to property. Links to relevant Revised Code of Washington (RCW) statutes and other informative YouTube videos on self-defense laws in Washington are provided.

This video discusses the complex legalities of using deadly force against an unarmed attacker. Featuring an interview with criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve and USCCA Director of Content Kevin Michalowski, the discussion delves into what constitutes a deadly threat, how different states define it, and the concept of great bodily harm. They also touch upon the intentional vagueness of self-defense laws, the importance of training, and strategies to navigate legal situations following a use-of-force incident.

This video discusses the critical legal and practical considerations of using deadly force in self-defense, focusing on when to act during an imminent threat. It uses a real-life scenario where a shooting occurred over the attempted theft of a hatchet, highlighting the legal principle of 'objectively reasonable' force. The content emphasizes that using deadly force for property defense is generally unlawful and that escape should always be prioritized. It advocates for responsible gun ownership and accurate decision-making regarding the use of deadly force, aligning with the USCCA's mission to educate and protect gun owners.

This video addresses the controversial topic of whether one can legally shoot an attacker in the back. The host emphasizes that if shooting someone in the back is the only option to stop an imminent deadly threat, it should be done, but stresses the critical importance of being prepared to justify that action. The description strongly advocates for absolute certainty in any use of deadly force. It also promotes the US Concealed Carry Association (USCCA) and their resources for concealed carry training and legal information.