This video analyzes the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Anderson, drawing a parallel between the court's focus on actual laws rather than generalized history and the methodology used in interpreting the Second Amendment under the NYSRPA v. Bruen case. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discusses how the court's approach in the Trump case, by prioritizing enacted laws over historical interpretations, aligns with the Bruen standard. The discussion touches upon the implications of this legal reasoning for future Second Amendment cases and highlights the importance of understanding historical context versus actual legal precedent.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
