This episode of Dangerous Liberty LIVE features an interview with award-winning investigative journalist Keli Rabon. The discussion centers on the Charlie Kirk case, with analysis of evidence and opinions shared. A significant portion of the conversation delves into citizen journalism, emphasizing the need for higher standards of truth, ethics, and objectivity to potentially replace mainstream media. The episode also touches upon Keli Rabon's background and advocacy for the Second Amendment, as well as Gary Melton's expertise as a former Green Beret and firearms instructor.
This is a preview for an episode of The Shawn Ryan Show featuring John Delaney, founder of "Real News. No Bullshit.". The conversation focuses on the state of modern media, propaganda, independent journalism, and the influence of platforms like China. They discuss media bias, censorship, and the ethical considerations of influencer-driven news. The episode aims to explore how information is consumed and manipulated in contemporary America. While the title mentions Jeffrey Epstein, the description indicates the core focus is on media and journalism.
This video delves into conspiracy theories surrounding an alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk, urging viewers to critically examine information before accepting it. The creator suggests that claims, particularly those from entities like the FBI, may not be entirely truthful. The content aims to encourage thoughtful questioning and responsible consumption of information, especially concerning controversial events. It also promotes the creator's work with the Task Force 70 Foundation through links to their YouTube channel and website.
This video delves into the societal role and perception of news, likening its consumption to religion and the news anchor to a modern-day pulpit. It questions why bad news garners more attention than good news, exploring the psychological urgency it creates. The description touches upon the ideal of unbiased reporting versus the reality of bias in the post-information age and ponders the definition of integrity within news institutions. The content suggests that news has become a primary source for answering life's deeper questions, with significant societal consequences.
The YouTube video title, "How to Bribe a Reviewer," and the description, "This doesn't matter anymore," strongly suggest a meta-commentary on the integrity of product reviews, potentially within the firearms community. Given the common trope of "bribing" for positive reviews, this video likely discusses or satirizes the ethics of reviewer compensation and its impact on perceived objectivity. The content's relevance to firearms enthusiasts is questionable without further context, but it could touch upon the reviewer landscape for firearms or related gear.
This video analyzes a news article about the ease of building 'ghost guns,' with the creator refuting the article's claims and asserting that the reporter committed several crimes in the process of investigating. The creator highlights alleged biases and factual inaccuracies within the article, using timestamps to dissect specific points. The video also touches on legal aspects and the potential for misrepresentation of statistics, while promoting the creator's merchandise, supplements, and support channels. The overall tone is critical of the journalistic approach to the topic and aims to provide a counter-narrative.
This video discusses a media scandal involving major news outlets like the Washington Post and CNN allegedly pushing fake news and fabricated quotes attributed to Donald Trump. The content focuses on media bias and the dissemination of misinformation, with a call to action for viewers to support the channel through various platforms and merchandise.
This video, titled 'Ant’s Rants - Yellow Journalism At It's Finest,' critiques media reporting, particularly concerning a child's incident. The description highlights concerns about media sensationalism and potential misrepresentation of events, using the term 'plunge' to question the narrative. The host, Anthony Colandro of Gun For Hire, expresses frustration with what he perceives as biased reporting and a failure to identify responsible parties, implying that the media is protecting criminals at public expense. The video also promotes various Gun For Hire resources including their website, academy, radio show, and social media channels, alongside information on obtaining firearm permits in NJ/NY and a 'Crime Proof Book'.
This video features Dana Loesch discussing her critique of media reporting, particularly concerning its portrayal of gun owners and specific media outlets. She argues that a single story or headline does not absolve the media of weeks of biased and reckless reporting. Loesch highlights instances where media platforms have been used to unfairly criticize law-abiding citizens and blame individuals for broader issues, asserting that such actions are not excused by isolated positive coverage.
This video features Grant Stinchfield critiquing The New York Times for what he describes as anti-gun propaganda. He alleges the newspaper employs tactics like lying by omission, taking comments out of context, and fabricating information to mislead its readers. The description suggests that Americans are losing trust in traditional media for truth and are instead becoming self-reliant in addressing their safety concerns in a "hostile world."
This video features Dana Loesch discussing the perceived bias of The New York Times with Grant Stinchfield. Loesch anticipates criticism from the Times regarding factual corrections, suggesting they view such fact-checking as an act of aggression. The discussion centers on the media's handling of information and potential bias, particularly in relation to topics that may be of interest to firearm owners and Second Amendment advocates.
This video critically analyzes media coverage of firearms organizations, specifically the NRA and its spokesperson Dana Loesch. The description alleges that major media outlets like The New York Times, Washington Post, and CNN, through an organization called Digital Content Next, are pushing a narrative to discredit the NRA. The video claims these outlets are protecting Antifa, which it describes as a violent group, while attacking the NRA, portraying it as a courageous defender against the 'violent left.' The core argument is that the media is biased against the NRA and gun rights.
