Videos tagged with Judicial Ruling

This video announces a significant legal victory in California where a federal judge issued a permanent injunction overturning a long-standing gun law. The presenter highlights this as a positive shift in the state's legal landscape concerning firearms. The description also includes promotional segments for legal services (Attorneys on Retainer) and precious metals (American Hartford Gold), along with social media links and a disclaimer that the content is opinion-based and not legal advice. The video emphasizes that viewers should not attempt anything shown and all work should be done by professionals.

This video reports on a significant legal development where a judge has reportedly struck down mandatory waiting periods for firearm purchases. The ruling is framed as a major victory for Second Amendment rights, with the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) being highlighted as a key player in the legal action. The content emphasizes the immediate impact and positive implications of this judicial decision for gun owners and Second Amendment advocates.

This YouTube video discusses a court ruling where a judge, described as an 'Obama Judge,' declared a "Machine Gun Ban" unconstitutional, implying the ruling extends to all National Firearms Act (NFA) items. The content creator, TYMPPP (The Yankee Marshal), promotes their merchandise and alternative channels, emphasizing viewer support and the absence of sponsors. The video also includes bloopers.

This video criticizes a judge's decision to uphold what the creator deems unconstitutional gun control legislation, citing the judge's reasoning that no one has been injured by the law yet. The content appears to be a commentary on legal and political aspects of gun rights, referencing a specific instance possibly in San Jose or Savannah. The creator expresses strong disapproval of the ruling and intends to highlight the perceived absurdity of the judicial reasoning.

This video discusses an "outrageous ruling" by the "2nd Circuit" court regarding firearms in New York. The creator expresses frustration that the court's decision, after being sent back by SCOTUS, is similar to a previous one and is seen as a "slap in the face" to gun owners. The description highlights that judges are appointed for life and urges viewers to consider the implications for the courts in the upcoming election.

This video discusses a recent update where a federal judge reportedly criticized the state of Illinois for infringing upon Second Amendment rights. The content focuses on a legal development related to gun control legislation in Illinois and a judge's strong stance against it, described as a "tongue lashing" and "GOLD."

This video discusses the legal challenges to Illinois' Assault Weapon Ban, specifically focusing on the "Schoenthal v. Raoul" case concerning carrying firearms on public transportation. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, expresses strong disapproval of the state's arguments, suggesting a judge is poised to rule unfavorably against the state. The content aims to educate viewers on the evolving legal landscape surrounding Second Amendment rights in Illinois.

This video delves into a recent Supreme Court ruling that was unanimously in favor of the NRA. It aims to explain the intricacies of how this outcome was achieved, posing a question of how the NRA managed to secure such a decisive victory in the highest court.

This video discusses the Biden administration and the Department of Justice appealing a judge's ruling that granted Second Amendment rights to migrants. The content frames this appeal as an 'epic backfire' against a perceived 'gun controlling judge.' The video focuses on the legal and political implications of the ruling and the administration's response, implying a strategic misstep by the government.

This video discusses a federal judge's ruling that found firearm bans in post offices unconstitutional. The content highlights this as a significant legal development, implying it impacts broader 'sensitive places' definitions and Second Amendment rights. The host suggests the implications are far-reaching, urging viewers to understand the broader context beyond just the post office ban.

This video analyzes a significant legal victory for Second Amendment rights, as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals allowed a preliminary injunction to go into effect, striking down California's "sensitive places" laws. This ruling means law-abiding citizens with concealed carry permits can now enter locations previously designated as gun-free zones. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner provides an in-depth analysis of the court's decision, the background of the Bonta case, and the implications of this ruling for firearm owners in California.

This video features Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, dissecting a court ruling regarding Colorado's new gun waiting periods. The focus is on the judge's reasoning for denying an injunction, which the speaker describes as 'disturbing' and potentially influential for future Second Amendment challenges. The video aims to educate viewers on these legal developments and encourage proactive understanding of their Second Amendment rights.