This video discusses a new law review article by Mark W. Smith published in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, focusing on the "third rails" of Second Amendment jurisprudence. It delves into how Second Amendment cases are currently handled, particularly post-Bruen, and explains how to properly use historical analogues to interpret the law. The content aims to guide legal analysis and potentially influence future court decisions regarding Second Amendment rights, providing insights for legal professionals and Second Amendment advocates.
This video discusses a new legal article titled "Dangerous But Not Unusual: Mistakes Courts Make Post Bruen..." by Mark Smith, published in the Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. The content delves into major Second Amendment arguments, plain text analysis of legal text, burden shifting to the government, constitutional tests, and the examination of historical analogue laws in post-Bruen litigation. Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and frequent media guest, provides analysis from the perspective of the "Four Boxes Diner," a platform focused on Second Amendment news and rights defense.
This video discusses a major Supreme Court decision (Rahimi) and argues it is a win for the Second Amendment. The presenter, constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, has released a law review article detailing how the Rahimi decision reinforces the frameworks established in Heller and Bruen. The video addresses claims by anti-gun groups of a victory and highlights the significance of the decision for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, distinguishing it from anti-gun propaganda. It emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
