This video breaks down the key legal arguments in Sanchez v. Bonta, a Ninth Circuit case challenging California's ban on firearm suppressors. It discusses CRPA's involvement, the court's request for expert counsel, and the oral arguments, focusing on the state's 'not an arm' defense and the potential impact on Second Amendment rights post-Bruen. The analysis explores whether suppressors are protected under the Second Amendment and forecasts potential outcomes for 2026. It also touches on the broader landscape of Second Amendment litigation and shifts under the Trump DOJ.
This video features William Kirk of Washington Gun Law and Kostas Moros from the Second Amendment Foundation engaging in their monthly discussion. The conversation centers around various issues pertaining to Second Amendment litigation, offering insights into legal challenges and advocacy related to gun rights in the United States.
This video delves into the significant changes recently implemented across Glock's pistol lineup, exploring the underlying motivations. It posits that beyond innovation, these overhauls are a strategic response to mounting political pressure and extensive litigation faced by the firearms industry. The analysis highlights how anti-gun legislation, particularly in certain states, compels even major manufacturers like Glock to adapt their products to ensure their continued viability and survival in a challenging legal and political landscape.
This video discusses ongoing litigation in Colorado concerning municipal "assault weapon" and magazine bans, specifically the RMGO v. Town of Superior case. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk analyzes the dangerous legal arguments being presented by the government, which he believes could set a precedent for upholding virtually any gun ban. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the implications for Second Amendment rights and provides links to the motion for summary judgment and resources for further information.
This video discusses a significant development in the legal battle over Washington State's magazine ban. The Supreme Court has ordered the State of Washington to respond to a petition in the Gators Custom Guns v. State of Washington case. This is a positive step, though it doesn't guarantee the Supreme Court will hear the case. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these legal matters and provides links to support the Silent Majority Foundation, which is heavily involved in funding this litigation.
This video analyzes Florida's Attorney General's unprecedented decision not to defend the state's 2018 age-to-purchase law for long guns and instead urged the Supreme Court to strike it down. The content breaks down the implications for the Second Amendment, compares the situation to California legal battles like SB 1127, and discusses potential impacts on future gun rights cases nationwide. It also encourages viewer engagement on the topic of age restrictions for Second Amendment rights and promotes supporting advocacy groups.
This video discusses the Firearms Policy Coalition's (FPC) successful litigation against the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the pistol brace ban. The DOJ has agreed to drop their appeal and cease defending the rule, effectively ending its enforcement and maintaining the status quo. The FPC retains the right to pursue attorney's fees. The video criticizes the DOJ's approach as lacking principle, suggesting they could have sought a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs rather than settling. The description also highlights VSO Gun Channel's role as an educational resource for responsible gun ownership and safety, emphasizing their commitment to objective testing and evaluation.
This YouTube video, "The Guardians Of The 2nd | Bill Sack 2AF | 2nd Syndicate LIVE EP 16", features Bill Sack, Director of Legal Operations at the Second Amendment Foundation, discussing Second Amendment advocacy and legal matters. The episode highlights Sack's extensive experience in legal operations, litigation, and public education within the gun rights space. The video also promotes the 2nd Syndicate's mission to protect Second Amendment rights, encouraging viewer support through donations and merchandise purchases. Guest co-host Mike from X American News is also featured.
This video discusses a significant legal development in Second Amendment rights, specifically the Fifth Circuit's refusal to allow 16 states to intervene in a Forced Reset Trigger lawsuit. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, breaks down the case background, the court's dismissal, and critiques the arguments of anti-gun groups. The discussion touches upon the broader gun control agenda and potential influences on such legal cases, including a reference to the Trump administration's impact. Smith also promotes his new article on post-Bruen litigation and emphasizes understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty for defending constitutional rights.
This video analyzes the Supreme Court's denial of cert in BNL Productions v. Newsom, which challenged California's gun show bans. Featuring CRPA President Chuck Michel, the discussion unpacks the implications of the denial, potential future legal challenges, and the broader fight for gun culture survival. It delves into the distinction between commercial and political speech, the evolving Second Amendment litigation landscape post-Bruen, and CRPA's ongoing legal strategies.
This video discusses breaking news from the Supreme Court regarding the Apache Stronghold case and its potential implications for an AR-15 ban. Legal scholar Mark Smith analyzes how the relisting of the Apache Stronghold case could pave the way for the Supreme Court to hear the Snope AR-15 ban case. The discussion is framed within the broader context of Second Amendment rights and constitutional law, referencing Smith's expertise and past legal scholarship, including work that influenced a federal judge's ruling on "assault weapon" bans.
This video breaks down the Supreme Court's decision to deny review of the Antonyuk v. James case concerning 'sensitive places' in New York. It explains what the case was about, why the Supreme Court likely rejected it, and the implications for other Second Amendment litigation, referencing cases like May v. Bonta and Duncan. The discussion also touches on preliminary injunctions versus final judgments, the strategies employed by organizations like CRPA, and the potential for increased pressure on the Court to clarify its Bruen decision. It encourages viewers to stay informed and support Second Amendment advocacy.
