This video discusses the potential impact of the "Modern Firearms Safety Act," a federal bill aimed at eliminating state-level handgun rosters nationwide. It highlights how laws in states like California, Massachusetts, and New York mandate specific features, such as microstamping, on approved handguns. This restriction, according to the video, prevents the sale of newer models and limits citizens' access to modern firearms while potentially infringing on Second Amendment rights. The description emphasizes the urgency due to impending deadlines and the need for public awareness regarding roster law flaws and constitutional challenges.
This video discusses potential methods states might use to ban handgun sales, citing the US Constitution as a current obstacle. It highlights microstamping technology as a likely avenue for future bans, with California already exploring this path. The video encourages viewers to be informed about these developments to protect their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a new California law, SB452, which is set to impose a significant ban on semi-automatic firearms due to microstamping requirements. The California Department of Justice has released a report indicating the law's viability, potentially impacting firearm ownership statewide. The description also includes promotional content for legal services and precious metals, alongside social media links and a disclaimer about the content not being legal advice and intended for educational/entertainment purposes only.
This video provides a detailed explanation of California's Handgun Roster, including its origins stemming from SB-15, its operational mechanics, and its impact on firearm owners within the state. The creator discusses the controversial microstamping requirement and argues that the roster is unconstitutional and should be abolished. The video aims to inform viewers about this significant piece of firearm legislation.
This video discusses recent news concerning California's firearm "Roster" law, specifically highlighting the Boland v. Bonta case. The description explains that this legal decision has led to the overturning of the microstamping requirement, which is significant for allowing new firearms to be added to the roster. The content emphasizes the positive impact of this development on the firearm market in California. The video also includes promotional material for American Hartford Gold and the creator's social media and merchandise.
This video discusses how a potential leap day error might have disrupted the ATF's eForms system, leading to its shutdown. It also touches on several other recent firearms-related news items, including an NYPD arrest for a replica sword gun, the activation of New Jersey's microstamping law, a call to Virginia's governor to veto anti-gun bills, and criticism of ATF director Steven Dettelbach. The description also includes affiliate links for TNVC, Hydra, and Viktos, as well as a Discord link.
This video discusses the potential reintroduction of microstamping legislation, a technology that etches microscopic markings onto spent casings. The content delves into its implications, potential legal challenges, and touches upon a specific lawsuit, Boland v. Bonta. It also highlights the role of CRPA and PCU in advocating for Second Amendment rights and provides information on how viewers can get involved. The discussion aims to inform viewers about legislative developments and their impact on gun ownership.
This YouTube video discusses a recent Supreme Court ruling (6-3) that reportedly blocked national firearm bans and registries. The content creator reacts to a gun control debate, highlighting advocacy for measures such as registries, red flag laws, and micro-stamping. The video also includes promotional links for USCCA and BlackoutCoffee, as well as social media and YouTube setup information. A legal disclaimer is included, stating the content is not legal advice.
This video discusses recent regulatory actions and legal challenges impacting firearm ownership, particularly focusing on the ATF's stance on "machine guns" and "trigger activators." It highlights how New Jersey is adopting microstamping requirements similar to California, creating unworkable regulations. The discussion also touches upon legal actions seeking documents related to NICS, litigation updates concerning New York firearm laws, and a settlement in Washington D.C. over Second Amendment breaches. Additionally, a mention of a school's action against a student for wearing a Gadsden patch is included, framing these events within the broader context of Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses the Sig M-18 pistol's addition to the California firearm roster, highlighting its significance due to an injunction on microstamping. The creator notes that while the M-18 is a welcome surprise for Californians, there are some differences in the version approved for the state. The video also includes affiliate links for USCCA and gold purchases, as well as links to the creator's social media and merchandise.
This video discusses the addition of a new 9mm handgun to California's approved handgun roster. It highlights the impact of a recent federal injunction on microstamping requirements, which has allowed major manufacturers to re-enter the California market. The video implies this new 9mm model from a prominent manufacturer could be a viable option for California residents facing roster restrictions, and touches upon the legal and market dynamics affecting handgun availability in the state.
This episode of "This Week in Guns" discusses various firearm-related news and political developments. Topics include proposed "gun trucks," the controversy surrounding microstamping in New Jersey, the IRS's authority to possess firearms, and an award for a "Second Amendment Traitor." The video also covers the credit card industry's role in tracking gun purchases, a federal appeals court ruling on Armslist, the House vote to repeal the brace rule, and Bank of America's cooperation with the FBI regarding gun owner information. It concludes with a look at Republican presidential candidates' stances on gun rights and Gavin Newsom's proposal for a 28th Amendment potentially limiting gun rights.
