This video discusses a significant Second Amendment case where a Court of Appeals heard oral arguments regarding a machine gun ban. Following a lower court's ruling that machine guns are protected arms, the 10th Circuit is now reviewing the case. The analysis is presented by Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and recognized Second Amendment scholar, who also hosts the Four Boxes Diner 2A channel. The discussion touches upon the broader implications for gun rights and the ongoing legal battles surrounding firearm ownership in the United States.
This video discusses a significant oral argument at the 7th Circuit Federal Appeals Court regarding the constitutionality of gun-free zones, particularly on public transit, under the Second Amendment. Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, provides analysis. The discussion touches upon the legal implications of such zones and their impact on gun owners' rights. Smith, host of the Four Boxes Diner 2A channel, is recognized for his expertise in Second Amendment law, with his scholarship cited by legal professionals and judges.
This video covers the significant oral arguments in the Mexico v. Smith & Wesson case before the Supreme Court, focusing on gun rights. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, discusses the legal implications and provides analysis. The description highlights his expertise, previous works, and the "four boxes" of American liberty framework, emphasizing the importance of understanding Bill of Rights news and analysis for defending individual freedoms.
This video discusses an upcoming Supreme Court oral argument in the significant gun case Mexico v. Smith & Wesson. Host Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, provides analysis. The video also references Smith's new article on post-Bruen litigation and his extensive background, including his expertise on the Second Amendment, his books, and his previous work cited by federal judges.
This video analyzes the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit's oral argument regarding Connecticut's assault weapons ban. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and frequent Fox News guest, discusses the legal arguments, particularly focusing on the "in common use" test and how judges often misinterpret Second Amendment cases. The content delves into the strategies employed by anti-gun advocates and highlights the importance of understanding constitutional rights beyond political voting. The analysis aims to equip gun owners with the knowledge to defend their liberties.
This video analyzes a major Second Amendment legal battle concerning the possession of firearms by non-violent felons. The US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit heard oral arguments in this significant case. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, a constitutional attorney with extensive experience in Second Amendment law and a background as a Supreme Court Bar member, professor, and media commentator, breaks down the current state of the law, the case's background, the original decision, and the timeline. He offers his predictions and a summary of the arguments, including the role of historical analogues. The analysis aims to inform viewers about the "four boxes" of American liberty and defend their rights.
This video analyzes oral arguments before the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concerning the federal government's ability to restrict handgun possession for individuals aged 18-20. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner breaks down the audio from the court proceedings, highlighting arguments related to Second Amendment rights, historical precedent, and the impact of the Rahimi case. The discussion delves into the legal framework surrounding firearm ownership for young adults.
This video analyzes recent developments surrounding the US Supreme Court case US v. Rahimi, a significant Second Amendment case. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, explores clues indicating which Supreme Court Justice will author the majority opinion. He breaks down the oral arguments and discusses the difference between real-world scenarios and hypothetical legal arguments. The content focuses on Second Amendment rights and legal analysis, drawing on the expertise of the host who is a member of the Supreme Court Bar and has had his work cited by federal judges.
This video provides highlights from a Washington State Supreme Court hearing concerning a magazine ban. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discusses the key points and outcomes of the case State of Washington v. Gators Guns. The content is geared towards individuals interested in gun rights and legal challenges to firearm regulations in Washington state. Contact information for Washington Gun Law is provided for those seeking legal advice or further information.
This YouTube video discusses a significant oral argument in the Duncan v. Bonta case before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case concerns California's ban on certain firearm magazines. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith provides an in-depth analysis of the background, opening statements from both California and pro-2A advocates, and arguments related to societal change, the burden of proof on the government, and the concept of "common use" in relation to firearms like machine guns. The video also touches on the strategic implications of an en banc hearing.
This video discusses a potential leak from the Supreme Court regarding a significant ATF-related case concerning the Chevron doctrine. Justice Brown Jackson's statement during oral arguments is highlighted as a potential indicator of the upcoming ruling's outcome. The content is presented by Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, who provides analysis from a constitutional attorney's perspective, touching on Second Amendment rights and the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court oral argument concerning whether states can remove President Trump from the 2024 Presidential Ballot under the 14th Amendment's "insurrection" clause. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and legal analyst, discusses the arguments presented and potential next steps in the case. The content emphasizes the "four boxes" of American liberty: soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box, with a focus on Second Amendment news and analysis.
