This video discusses three proposed gun control bills in Oregon (HB 3075, HB 3076, and SB 243) that legal expert William Kirk of Washington Gun Law believes will significantly impact Second Amendment rights in the state. He argues these measures are an effort towards civilian disarmament and will not reduce violence. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these bills and offers resources like Right to Bear for legal protection and the Oregon Firearms Federation for advocacy.
This video discusses a new Oregon law regarding unserialized and undetectable firearms, set to take effect in less than a month. It highlights the first lawsuit filed against this law, Montgomery v. Rosenblum, and argues that historically, homemade firearms have been permitted and even encouraged. The case is presented as a potential roadmap for challenges in other states. The description also includes calls to action for supporting various firearm advocacy organizations like the Firearms Policy Coalition, Oregon Firearms Federation, and Right to Bear.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the legal challenges to Oregon's Ballot Measure 114. The discussion centers on the ruling in Oregon Firearms Federation v. Kotek, which upheld bans on "large capacity magazines" and new pre-purchase licensing requirements. Kirk highlights that a Republican-appointed judge sided with the state on all arguments, impacting Second Amendment rights. The video aims to educate viewers on the implications of this ruling and encourage them to stay informed.
This video discusses the legal challenge to Oregon's Ballot Measure 114, titled Oregon Firearms Federation v. Kotek. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, details the case, highlighting the significant testimony provided by Massad Ayoob. The trial is scheduled to commence on June 5th, and the video aims to educate viewers on the implications of this measure for their Second Amendment rights. Contact information for Washington Gun Law is provided for further assistance.
William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses Oregon's SB 348, arguing it's a disguised version of the enjoined Ballot Measure 114. He criticizes the Oregon State Legislature for attempting to enact restrictive gun legislation through the legislative process, claiming it's an attempt to make the laws appear more Constitutional. The video encourages Oregon residents to pay attention to this bill and highlights resources for education and support, including the Oregon Firearms Federation.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, providing an update on Oregon Ballot Measure 114. The discussion centers on ongoing legal efforts to challenge the measure, which is described as an attempt to strip Oregon residents of their Second Amendment rights. The video includes links to watch oral arguments, legal documents, and related resources for further education on the topic, encouraging viewers to stay informed and involved.
This video provides an update on the legal status of Oregon Ballot Measure 114, which is currently on hold. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law discusses the ongoing legal challenges, specifically mentioning the case "Oregon Firearms Federation v. Brown." The video highlights efforts to protect Second Amendment rights in Oregon and encourages viewers to educate themselves on the matter. Links are provided to relevant legal documents, plaintiff organizations, and other informative videos about Measure 114 and Oregon gun laws.
This video provides an update on legal battles concerning firearm rights in Oregon, specifically focusing on Ballot Measure 114. It discusses two key court cases: O.F.F. v. Brown (bad news) and Arnold v. Brown (good news). The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, aims to educate viewers on the evolving legal landscape and its impact on Second Amendment rights, acknowledging the fluctuating nature of the situation.
This video provides an urgent update from William Kirk of Washington Gun Law regarding significant developments in the legal challenge against Oregon Ballot Measure 114. The update focuses on the lawsuit Oregon Firearms Federation v. Brown, with links provided to court documents, the plaintiffs (Oregon Firearms Federation), and the Sherman County Sheriff. The description also references other related YouTube videos discussing the specifics of Measure 114, its perceived intent to disarm citizens, and how voters might be misled. A Patreon subscription and other social media channels for Washington Gun Law are also promoted.
William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the lawsuit challenging Oregon Ballot Measure 114, highlighting it as potentially the most restrictive gun control legislation enacted by a state. The video details the case "Oregon Firearms Federation v. Brown," filed in the US District Court, which attacks the measure from multiple legal angles supported by recent case law. With the measure set to become effective on December 8, 2022, the discussion emphasizes the urgency for citizens to educate themselves on the implications. The description also links to several supporting organizations and related videos offering deeper insights into the measure and its impact.
This YouTube video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, providing urgent updates on Oregon Ballot Measure 114. Kirk describes the measure as "the absolute most terrible piece of legislation currently kicking around in our country." The video references external resources for election results, details on Ballot Measure 114 from Ballotpedia, news articles from Statesman Journal, and organizational websites like Stop114, Oregon Firearms Federation, and NRAILA, all dedicated to fighting this legislation. Links to the creator's other content and social media are also provided.
This video features Kevin Starrett of the Oregon Firearms Federation discussing Ballot Measure 114, a contentious ballot measure in Oregon. Starrett joins Tom Gresham on Gun Talk Radio to explain the details and implications of this measure for firearm owners in the state. The discussion likely covers the potential impact of Measure 114 on gun rights, regulations, and the firearm community in Oregon.
