This video discusses the legal challenge to California's ban on firearm magazines holding more than ten rounds in the landmark Duncan v. Bonta case. CRPA President Chuck Michel and Kevin Small break down California's opposition brief, exploring arguments related to the 'takings clause,' the definition of 'arms' under the Second Amendment, and historical parallels. The discussion highlights how this case could be the most significant Second Amendment legal battle since the Bruen decision and anticipates its potential path to the U.S. Supreme Court, with implications for gun owners nationwide. It also touches on the influence of gun control advocacy groups and recent DOJ reversals.
This video analyzes a significant legal ruling by the Fifth Circuit that impacts suppressor rights in the US. The court declared the NFA's suppressor registration scheme "presumptively constitutional," drawing justification from the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. This precedent could have far-reaching implications, potentially affecting registration requirements for magazines, rifles, and ammunition. The content will break down the DOJ's legal strategy, the implications of the Peterson case, and the broader consequences for Second Amendment rights, urging viewers to stay informed about potential legislative and judicial paths forward.
This video analyzes a significant reversal by the DOJ, which now argues that suppressors are protected under the Second Amendment. The content explores the implications for gun owners, its connection to the Peterson case, and potential effects on other firearm accessories like magazines and SBRs. It discusses whether this marks the end of the NFA's taxation scheme and the potential inclusion of the Hearing Protection Act in federal legislation, suggesting a major shift in 2A policy. The video encourages viewer engagement through comments regarding suppressor regulation.
This video discusses the rapidly evolving legal landscape surrounding suppressors (silencers) in the United States, with a particular focus on California. CRPA President Chuck Michel breaks down recent legal developments, including the DOJ's admission in the Peterson case that suppressors are constitutionally protected arms, and the CRPA's involvement in the Sanchez lawsuit challenging California's ban. The content also covers the potential impact of the Bruen decision and federal legislation like the Hearing Protection Act. It aims to inform viewers about these changes and encourage support for the ongoing legal fight.
This video discusses the filing of an amicus brief in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Peterson case. The brief, filed in support of the Second Amendment, was a collaborative effort involving B&T USA, FRACaction, SB Tactical, and Silencer Shop. The content aims to provide viewers with the details surrounding this legal action and its implications for gun rights.
You've reached the end! 5 videos loaded.
