This video discusses the resignations of prosecutors from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, framed as a protest against Donald Trump and his DOJ. The content delves into legal and political analysis, with the presenter, Mark W. Smith, identified as a Second Amendment scholar, constitutional attorney, and frequent Fox News guest. His work has been cited by federal judges in Second Amendment cases. The discussion also touches upon the broader concept of defending liberty through various means.
This video discusses a legal decision in the Daniel Penny trial, specifically the dismissal of Count I. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, criticizes the ruling as a "sham" and "legal buffoonery," suggesting it's designed to achieve a predetermined verdict. The content focuses on the legal aspects of the case rather than firearm specifics, highlighting concerns about the justice system and its impact on rights. Links to news articles and resources for further information are provided.
This video, featuring USCCA Director of Content Kevin Michalowski and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve, analyzes the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. It highlights how prosecutors used Rittenhouse's interest in violent first-person-shooter video games, like "Call of Duty," as evidence against him in court. The discussion emphasizes that personal activities and social media presence can be heavily scrutinized and potentially used out of context during legal proceedings related to violent encounters. The video also touches on post-trial behavior and establishing personal values.
This video features the U.S. Concealed Carry Association's Director of Content, Kevin Michalowski, and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve analyzing a gas station security footage incident where an employee shoots at a fleeing shoplifter. They discuss the legal ramifications, ethical considerations, and potential dangers of using deadly force in such a situation. The analysis emphasizes that deadly force is only justified to prevent death or great bodily harm, and the employee's actions were not legally justifiable, potentially leading to severe legal consequences. The video advises gun owners to remain calm and use proper judgment, highlighting the lack of firearms training observed in the incident.
This video discusses how the caliber and type of ammunition used in a concealed carry handgun could potentially bias a judge or jury in a self-defense case. USCCA's Kevin Michalowski and former prosecutor Tom Grieve explore how non-mainstream or novelty calibers might negatively influence legal proceedings. They advise opting for standard calibers and a "gray man" approach to minimize potential complications and ensure a defense attorney can effectively counter misinformation.
This YouTube video, titled "Judge Destroys Prosecutor in Rittenhouse Trial," focuses on a specific legal proceeding related to the Kyle Rittenhouse case. The description highlights a dramatic moment in the trial where the judge reportedly criticizes the prosecutor. The video also includes promotional links for various brands and resources, including an email list, Patreon, Blackout Coffee, GNG Shirts, Gun Owners of America, WPSN, and a backup YouTube channel. It also lists the equipment used for video production and includes a disclaimer emphasizing the informational and entertainment purpose of the content, along with safety guidelines.
This video discusses the legal implications of using a modified firearm in self-defense. It features Kevin Michalowski from the USCCA and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve, who explain how modifications can be used against an individual in court by a prosecutor. They emphasize that illegal modifications are always unacceptable and that even seemingly minor cosmetic changes or choices in ammunition can be sensationalized to influence a jury. The discussion also touches on the importance of responsible social media presence and understanding the hierarchy of firearm modifications in a legal context.
This video features Kevin Michalowski of the USCCA and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve discussing the legal ramifications of using a firearm in self-defense. They address whether an individual will be forced to appear in court after a self-defense shooting and explore the factors prosecutors consider when deciding whether to pursue charges. The discussion also touches on the potential duration of court proceedings and offers advice for responsibly armed Americans on how to navigate the post-shooting investigation, emphasizing communication through an attorney.
This YouTube video discusses the legal justification of the shooting of Andrew Brown Jr., as stated by the prosecutor. The title indicates that body camera footage related to the incident has been revealed. The description includes calls for donations, information about channel memberships, and links to the creator's social media profiles on Twitch, Instagram, and Twitter. It also mentions a promotional code for Karmaloop.
This video reports on a judge's decision to remove an anti-gun prosecutor from the McCloskey case. The content appears to be politically charged and focused on legal proceedings related to gun rights. The creator promotes their website, email list, and various affiliate partners within the firearms and related lifestyle industries, including Gun Owners of America and Warrior Poet Society. They also provide links to their merchandise and social media platforms.
This video, "Into the Fray Episode 288," analyzes a Walmart self-defense shooting incident. It discusses the legalities of using deadly force, focusing on when the threat ceases and an individual should stop shooting. The video highlights a case where a woman, initially a victim, faced felony charges due to actions after the initial threat subsided. It emphasizes the legal requirement to reasonably articulate an imminent fear of death or great bodily harm and the importance of knowing when to cease shooting in self-defense. The USCCA's mission to educate and protect gun owners is also promoted.
This video from the USCCA features attorney Tom Grieve explaining the implications of calling 911 after a self-defense incident. Grieve, a former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney, advises viewers on why contacting the police is generally recommended following an attack. The video highlights USCCA's mission and encourages viewers to become members for access to full webinars and benefits like the Self-Defense SHIELD.
