This video discusses the legal challenge to California's ban on firearm magazines holding more than ten rounds in the landmark Duncan v. Bonta case. CRPA President Chuck Michel and Kevin Small break down California's opposition brief, exploring arguments related to the 'takings clause,' the definition of 'arms' under the Second Amendment, and historical parallels. The discussion highlights how this case could be the most significant Second Amendment legal battle since the Bruen decision and anticipates its potential path to the U.S. Supreme Court, with implications for gun owners nationwide. It also touches on the influence of gun control advocacy groups and recent DOJ reversals.
This video discusses a significant legal ruling in Florida that has struck down the state's open carry ban as unconstitutional. The decision, influenced by Supreme Court precedents, asserts that the Second Amendment right to bear arms includes the right to carry openly. The ban, previously enforced under Statute 790.053, meant citizens had to conceal firearms or face arrest. The ruling, stemming from an incident on July 4th, 2022, has immediate implications for law enforcement and citizens across Florida, potentially setting a precedent for other states.
This video discusses reports of senior DOJ officials considering restricting firearm purchases for transgender Americans following the Minneapolis Catholic school shooting. CRPA President Chuck Michel explains the legal framework for firearm prohibitions, emphasizing that federal law requires individual adjudication rather than group-based bans. The discussion covers how such a ban could theoretically be implemented (4473, rulemaking, statute), the constitutional issues with classifying entire groups as 'mentally ill,' and the dangers of setting precedent for disarming disfavored groups. The segment also touches upon the broader mental health crisis and the importance of due process in relation to Second Amendment rights, referencing the Rahimi Supreme Court decision.
This video discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in Florida, where an appeals court ruled the state's open carry ban unconstitutional under the Bruen decision. The content delves into the legal framework, historical context of open vs. concealed carry, and procedural next steps. It also includes sponsorships for legal services and firearm-related products, alongside calls to action for supporting gun rights organizations.
This video provides a breakdown of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that struck down New Mexico's seven-day firearm waiting period, deeming it an unconstitutional burden on the Second Amendment. The content details the law, the court's reasoning based on landmark cases like Heller, Bruen, and Rahimi, and explores the potential implications for waiting periods in other states, such as California, Hawaii, and Illinois. It emphasizes the ruling as a significant advancement for gun rights nationwide.
This video from Four Boxes Diner, hosted by constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning young Americans' rights. The analysis touches on historical methodology in Second Amendment cases, common arguments made by anti-gun judges, and specifically addresses arguments against gun ownership for individuals aged 18-20. The host also references his legal scholarship and a previous court case where his work was cited.
This video discusses the potential implications of Donald Trump's criminal conviction on the Second Amendment. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner analyzes how the conviction, which makes Trump a "convicted felon" and potentially disarmed, could paradoxically benefit the gun rights movement. The discussion touches on the legal ramifications for a "normal civilian" and how these developments might aid in the fight for Second Amendment liberties, referencing the Rahimi case and post-Bruen litigation.
This video discusses a breaking legal development concerning Second Amendment rights, specifically focusing on a US district court in Pennsylvania that has placed a stay on a decision impacting 18-20 year olds' access to firearms. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith from Four Boxes Diner provides analysis of this judicial decision, referencing related cases like Rahimi and Judge Jordan's rulings. The content explores the implications of this stay and offers predictions on future legal outcomes. The presenter emphasizes understanding the 'four boxes' of American liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammunition.
This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith speaking at the Second Amendment Foundation's Gun Rights Policy Conference. He discusses "The Four Boxes of American Liberty," the historical and legal importance of the Second Amendment, referencing key Supreme Court cases like Heller, McDonald, Caetano, and Bruen. Smith also analyzes recent legal developments, including the Rahimi case, the "ghost gun" case (Vanderstock), and the legal status of suppressors as "arms." The discussion touches on issues related to suppressor laws, targeted taxes, and patent law, all presented from a pro-Second Amendment perspective by a notable constitutional scholar and author.
This video analyzes oral arguments before the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concerning the federal government's ability to restrict handgun possession for individuals aged 18-20. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner breaks down the audio from the court proceedings, highlighting arguments related to Second Amendment rights, historical precedent, and the impact of the Rahimi case. The discussion delves into the legal framework surrounding firearm ownership for young adults.
This video discusses a recent US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruling stating that illegal aliens do not possess Second Amendment rights. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner analyzes the decision, exploring the definition of "the people" in constitutional context and its relation to the Bruen and Rahimi cases. The content delves into why the argument for illegal aliens having Second Amendment rights is flawed, offering analysis from a legal perspective. The channel focuses on Second Amendment news and constitutional rights, with its host being a Supreme Court Bar member and published author.
This video discusses a major breaking news development concerning the Second Amendment. The Biden/Harris Department of Justice has filed an anti-gun brief in the US Court of Appeals. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner provides analysis on the potential impacts of this brief, particularly in relation to the Rahimi case and the establishment of a 'Rahimi Standard.' The discussion delves into arguments presented by the DOJ, including "put to death" and "colonial" rationales, and examines the concept of the "relevant period" and "confirmatory analytics" in legal arguments surrounding gun rights. The video emphasizes the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box, to defend individual freedoms.
