This video provides a live recap of the Third Circuit's proceedings in ANJRPC v. Platkin (also known as Cheeseman v. Platkin), a legal challenge to New Jersey's assault weapon ban. The discussion features Joe LoPorto, Director of the New Jersey Firearms Owners' Syndicate, analyzing the case and its potential implications, including the possibility of a Circuit Split on the issue. The content aims to educate viewers on the legal landscape surrounding firearm rights in New Jersey.
This video breaks down a major precedential ruling from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals concerning New Jersey's concealed carry laws, specifically in the cases of Koons v. Platkin and Siegel v. Platkin. It details the wins for gun owners, including the unconstitutionality of the liability insurance mandate, the "default no carry" rule on private property, and the ban on carrying in vehicles. The state's wins include bans on carrying in various public places and the "four reputable persons" requirement. The ruling impacts millions of gun owners in the Third Circuit and provides insight into how federal courts are applying the Bruen test to "sensitive places" restrictions.
This YouTube video discusses a significant opportunity for Donald Trump to protect the Second Amendment. The analysis focuses on potential judicial appointments to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, highlighting how these appointments could impact gun rights. The video features Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and prominent Second Amendment advocate, sharing his insights. Smith is described as a constitutional attorney, a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar, a professor, a frequent Fox News guest, and a New York Times bestselling author, with a history of influential legal scholarship.
This video from Four Boxes Diner, hosted by constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning young Americans' rights. The analysis touches on historical methodology in Second Amendment cases, common arguments made by anti-gun judges, and specifically addresses arguments against gun ownership for individuals aged 18-20. The host also references his legal scholarship and a previous court case where his work was cited.
This video analyzes the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Range v. USA, which struck down a federal ban on firearm possession for nonviolent felons. The ruling asserts that this prohibition infringes upon Second Amendment rights, challenging the established interpretation that all felons are permanently barred from gun ownership. The discussion covers the case's implications, potential Supreme Court involvement, procedural aspects, Mr. Range's conviction and legal challenges, the government's defense, the Bruen analysis, and connections to related cases.
This YouTube video discusses a significant legal victory for Second Amendment rights, where 13 out of 15 circuit court judges ruled in favor of restoring the rights of an individual named Mr. Range. The Third Circuit En Banc panel's opinion is highlighted as a potential path to further successes for gun rights advocates. The description also includes promotional links for "Attorneys on Retainer" with a discount code, a "Constitution Book," and merchandise, along with social media links. A clear disclaimer states the content is opinions, not legal advice, and for educational/entertainment purposes.
This video discusses a recent ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding Delaware's "assault weapon" ban. While the court denied a preliminary injunction, the video suggests there are significant developments in the case worth noting. Legal expert Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner provides analysis, drawing on his background as a constitutional attorney and author. The content aims to inform viewers about their Second Amendment rights and relevant legal battles, referencing concepts like the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video discusses a significant court order in the Range v. ATF/Garland case, which pertains to 18 USC 922g1. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, known for his appearances on Fox News and his writings on Second Amendment issues, provides analysis of the case and its implications. The content focuses on legal aspects of firearm ownership and the interpretation of laws concerning prohibited persons. The discussion delves into what constitutes a "felon" in the context of these laws and what the court's order for supplemental briefs might signify.
This video from The Four Boxes Diner, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The court denied a request for rehearing En Banc in the Lara v. Pennsylvania case, which pertains to the rights of 18-20 year olds to carry firearms. Mark explains the legal background, the burden shifting to the government, and historical precedents, highlighting the implications of this decision for gun owners' rights.
This episode of GunForHireRadio, #661, focuses on a significant Third Circuit Court decision related to Chevron Deference. The discussion also touches on Tammy Murphy's potential Senate bid. The show features guests from www.news2a.com. The episode delves into legal and political aspects relevant to firearms, with a strong emphasis on rights and regulations.
This video breaks down a significant Second Amendment victory in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning the right to bear arms in public for young adults. The analysis focuses on the dissenting opinion of Judge Luis Restrepo and highlights three key errors in his legal reasoning. The content is presented by Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, a constitutional attorney with extensive experience and publications related to Second Amendment rights.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the significant legal case of Koons v. Platkin before the Third Circuit. The case challenges New Jersey's recent "sensitive places" gun laws, enacted in response to the Bruen Supreme Court decision. The discussion centers on the hearing for injunctions against these laws, which are argued to effectively create a statewide gun-free zone. The video aims to educate viewers on the potential implications of this ruling for Second Amendment rights and encourages support for the Firearms Policy Coalition.
