This video discusses a legal challenge to an ATF rule that classifies certain triggers, when standing alone, as machine guns. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, analyzes the NAGR v. Garland case, where the Department of Justice is reportedly using language from the Cargill opinion to bolster its argument. The video explores whether this legal maneuver grants new life to the ATF's controversial trigger rule and encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue. It also provides links to the relevant memorandum, a video idea submission form, and various Washington Gun Law resources.
William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses the court's refusal to revive the ATF's trigger rule, specifically concerning forced reset and wide open triggers. This ruling is a continuation of the NAGR v. Garland case, representing a victory against ATF's confiscation efforts. The video highlights the importance of staying informed about Second Amendment rights and encourages viewers to support the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) for their legal advocacy.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
