This video explains the "Vampire Rule" concerning concealed carry (CCW) in the US, particularly focusing on California and Hawaii. The rule, conceptually similar to how vampires require an invitation, dictates that property owners must grant permission for concealed carriers to be on their premises. The description highlights that California has stricter requirements, mandating written permission for CCW in public businesses, while Hawaii offers a more lenient approach with verbal or general approval. Both regulations are presented as stemming from post-Bruen legal interpretations.
This video analyzes a historic amicus brief filed by the U.S. Department of Justice supporting the Second Amendment in the Wolford v. Lopez case, challenging Hawaii's 'Vampire Rule'. Legal counsel Kostas Moros of Michel & Associates joins to discuss the brief's unprecedented nature, its potential impact on 'sensitive places' bans, California's SB2, and future Second Amendment litigation following the Bruen decision. The discussion also touches on how this could influence related cases like May v. Bonta, Duncan v. Bonta, and Snoe v. Raoul, and provides a timeline for expected outcomes. The CRPA's own amicus brief is highlighted, emphasizing the ongoing legal battle for Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in New York, where a federal court struck down the "Vampire Rule." This rule prohibited Concealed Carry (CCW) permit holders from entering businesses and stores open to the public. The video, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith of Four Boxes Diner, explains the background of the rule, the recent adverse ruling, and NY State's appeal to the Second Circuit. Smith analyzes the legal implications and offers his perspective on the likely outcome of the appeal, highlighting this as very positive news for gun owners' rights.
This video analyzes a significant legal victory for the Second Amendment in New York. A US District Court, under Judge John Sinatra, has ruled the state's "vampire rule" regarding concealed carry unconstitutional. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discusses how the court rejected attempts to use outdated laws to justify modern gun bans, calling it a major loss for anti-gun advocates and a win for gun owners' rights. The analysis highlights the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty to defend constitutional freedoms.
This video discusses a recent 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision regarding California and Hawaii's "Bruen Response" bills, specifically focusing on the "Vampire Rule." The content is presented as opinion and explicitly states it is not legal advice. The creator directs viewers to American Hartford Gold for precious metals and provides social media links and merchandise. A disclaimer warns viewers against attempting anything shown in the video and emphasizes that it is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
This video discusses the ongoing legal battle in federal court regarding New York's ban on firearms in "sensitive places," specifically focusing on public parks and the controversial "Vampire Rule." Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes the legal arguments, tracing the origins of the "sensitive places" concept and its historical context, including the Black Codes. The discussion delves into the unconstitutionality of such bans, referencing the 14th Amendment and how the burden shifts to the government to justify these restrictions. Smith, with extensive experience before the Supreme Court and a history of impactful legal scholarship, provides an in-depth analysis for Second Amendment advocates.
You've reached the end! 6 videos loaded.
