This video discusses a significant legal development where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that New Mexico's firearm waiting period is likely unconstitutional. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, explains the court's decision in Ortega v. Lujan Grisham, highlighting how the three-judge panel rejected the state's arguments. The ruling has potential implications for similar laws in other states, and viewers are encouraged to educate themselves on their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a critical Second Amendment case before the First Circuit Court of Appeals concerning Maine's mandatory firearm purchase waiting period. The legal challenge, framed within the context of the Bruen decision, questions the constitutionality of modern gun laws that lack historical precedent. The host, Jared, breaks down the court's arguments, the significance of the case, and its potential impact on gun owners nationwide. The video also features promotions for Blackout Coffee Company, Attorneys On Retainer, and various firearm accessory retailers.
This video discusses proposed legislation in Oregon, specifically SB 243, which aims to further restrict firearm ownership. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details the bill's provisions, including a 72-hour waiting period, a ban on rapid-fire devices, and the creation of new gun-free zones. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these developments and their potential impact on responsible gun owners in Oregon, emphasizing the importance of understanding legislation affecting Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses a significant legal development in Maine where a Federal Judge has granted a preliminary injunction against the state's firearm waiting period law. Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, analyzes the ruling and its implications. The description also references his latest 2A article on judicial mistakes in post-Bruen litigation and promotes his social media presence. The content centers on the legal defense of Second Amendment rights and challenges to gun control measures.
This video features Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discussing a recent ruling from the United States District Court for the State of Maine. The court found Maine's mandatory 72-hour waiting period for firearm purchases unconstitutional due to a lack of historical support. While the ruling is expected to be appealed, it offers valuable legal arguments for challenging similar laws in other states. Kirk emphasizes that delaying gun rights is effectively denying them and encourages viewers to educate themselves on these issues.
This video title, 'Can’t Take It Home Same Day,' likely refers to the waiting period required by law before a firearm purchase can be completed and the buyer can take possession of the firearm. This implies a discussion around firearm acquisition, legal processes, and potentially the types of firearms being considered. It could be a personal experience or an explanation of the regulations surrounding gun purchases.
This video critically analyzes New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's proposed 2024 gun control package, labeling it "insane" and an "anti-2A agenda." The content creator breaks down specific measures, including an assault weapons ban, the potential to sue gun manufacturers, and a 14-day waiting period for firearm purchases. The video also addresses proposed bans on guns in public spaces like parks and polling places. It touches upon the influence of anti-2A lobbying groups and their ties to Michael Bloomberg, aiming to inform viewers and encourage defense of Second Amendment rights. The creator encourages viewers to share the video and join the conversation to "Keep America Tactical."
This video analyzes a new lawsuit originating from Vermont that aims to challenge existing gun control measures, specifically focusing on magazine capacity bans and waiting periods. The presenter suggests this legal action could be a pivotal moment in 'demolishing' widely accepted gun control regulations, potentially setting a new precedent for Second Amendment rights.
This video analyzes a legal decision where a US District Court Judge denied a request for a preliminary injunction against Colorado's firearm waiting period law. The judge, an 86-year-old appointed during the Jimmy Carter administration, upheld the law. The content creator, Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, breaks down the legal reasoning and implications of this ruling for Second Amendment rights, framing it as a challenge to the 2A that was not successful in court.
This video discusses a significant gun control package being considered in Tennessee, a red state, with Governor Bill Lee calling a special legislative session to address nine major bills. These proposals include firearm bans, regulations, and a 15-day waiting period. The content appears to be opinion-based and not legal advice, with disclaimers regarding professional work and educational/entertainment purposes.
This YouTube video discusses the decision-making process between purchasing from a new company versus waiting. The description includes a call to action for donations via CashApp, a linktr.ee for further information, and a link to purchase merchandise. While the title and description do not explicitly mention firearms or specific models, the presence of a gun-related channel name ('aregulargunguy') and merchandise (patches) strongly suggests a connection to the firearms community. The content likely explores aspects of consumer behavior within this niche.
This video addresses the significant issue of long wait times for obtaining firearm licenses, potentially spanning three years. While the description provides a link to the full video, it doesn't offer specific details about the firearms or topics covered within it. Based solely on the title, the content likely explores the bureaucratic processes, legal hurdles, and potential frustrations associated with gun ownership licensing. It may also touch upon the implications of such delays for legal firearm acquisition and Second Amendment rights.
