This video, titled "So Why Does Florida Make You Wait?", delves into the legal and constitutional challenges surrounding Florida's 3-day waiting period for firearm purchases. Hosted by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, the content focuses on the lawsuit "Dunn v. Glass", examining the complaint to educate viewers on why these laws are considered flawed. The description also promotes "Right to Bear", a self-defense protection service, and provides links for video ideas, newsletter sign-ups, and contact information for Washington Gun Law.
This video critically examines the impact of mandatory 7-day gun waiting periods, arguing that they do not deter criminals or abusers but leave law-abiding citizens vulnerable during critical moments. The creator highlights real-world tragedies where delays in firearm acquisition proved fatal. The content delves into the ineffectiveness of these 'cooling-off' laws, their potential to turn citizens into victims, and asserts that the Second Amendment should not be subject to arbitrary timers. It promotes pro-Second Amendment merchandise, membership, and advocacy initiatives.
This YouTube video discusses a "two-punch" delivery from Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) targeting gun controllers. The content appears to focus on legislative actions or advocacy, specifically mentioning opposition to waiting periods and actions involving senators. The video also promotes a sponsor, Renewal Rain, offering free shipping with a provided code.
This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses a court ruling that declares waiting periods for firearm purchases unconstitutional. The host promotes various pro-Second Amendment sponsors, including Blackout Coffee, Tristartrading for apparel, and Attorneys On Retainer for legal defense. It also encourages viewers to support gun rights organizations like Gun Owners of America and the Second Amendment Foundation. The description includes affiliate links for camera equipment used in video production and discount codes for firearm-related retailers like CMMG and Brownells.
This video title, "Do Waiting Periods on Gun purchases Save Lives or Sacrifice Them?", directly addresses a significant debate within firearm policy. It questions the effectiveness and potential negative consequences of waiting periods for purchasing firearms. The description indicates the channel relies on viewer support and links to merchandise, suggesting a focus on advocacy or discussion within the firearms community, rather than product reviews or demonstrations.
Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses how waiting periods and mandatory training for firearm purchases can tragically cost lives. The video highlights a case near Detroit where Michigan's gun laws allegedly put a woman's life at risk during an attack by her abusive ex-boyfriend. The content emphasizes the importance of education and the Second Amendment, promoting resources like the Sonoran Desert Institute for firearms education and encouraging viewers to contact Washington Gun Law for legal advice.
This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the legal implications and effectiveness of statutory waiting periods for firearm purchases. Kirk argues that court rulings upholding these waiting periods may become a significant method of disarming citizens, highlighting the disturbing precedent and potential future consequences. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these issues and offers resources for staying informed about their Second Amendment rights.
This video discusses the constitutionality of firearm waiting periods, specifically referencing the Ortega v. Grisham case challenging New Mexico's laws. Host William Kirk of Washington Gun Law argues that these waiting periods infringe upon inalienable rights. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides links to the legal complaint and the NRA for those who wish to support the legal challenge. It also includes a promotion for PaintCam home security and contact information for Washington Gun Law.
This video discusses a legal challenge to firearm waiting periods being heard in federal court. The description also includes promotional links for merchandise, gun accessories, and organizations dedicated to Second Amendment rights, such as Gun Owners of America, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation. It also lists equipment used for video production.
This video critically analyzes California Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed "Right to Safety" amendment, which aims to significantly amend the US Constitution and undermine the Second Amendment. The creator details proposed measures such as raising the gun purchase age to 21, implementing universal background checks, mandatory waiting periods, and banning civilian ownership of AR-15s. The video suggests Newsom's initiative is a political move for a potential presidential run and argues it represents a severe threat to gun rights, potentially exceeding the impact of current federal gun control efforts. The content encourages viewers to understand Newsom's strategy, its implications, and how to counter it.
This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses proposed legislation that includes waiting periods, potential gun bans, and the establishment of a gun registry. The title "MUST PASS" bill suggests a critical and potentially alarming piece of legislation for gun owners. The description includes various affiliate links for firearm-related products and organizations such as BulletSafe, Gun Owners of America, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation, indicating a strong focus on Second Amendment advocacy and related gear.
Tulsa Police Chief Wendell Franklin advocates for potential relinquishment of certain Second Amendment freedoms in exchange for increased gun control and public safety. He draws parallels to post-9/11 security measures and the adoption of seatbelt laws, suggesting a willingness to accept waiting periods for firearm purchases and stricter regulations on 'ghost guns'. The video critically examines the implications of sacrificing individual liberties for perceived safety and explores alternative solutions.
